Re: LFB library
Dong Ligang <firstname.lastname@example.org> Tue, 01 July 2008 02:11 UTC
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:11:13 +0800
From: Dong Ligang <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: LFB library
Comments: To: Aron Silverton <Aron.Silverton@Sun.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_3329_672642.1214878273461"
Dear Aron, My research group has provided more LFB definition. Please check enclosed file that have been submitted to ForCES group. Yes, NPF FAPI can be a good reference for defining LFBs. regards Ligang ----- 原始邮件 ----- 发件人: Aron Silverton <Aron.Silverton@Sun.COM> 收件人: FORCES@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM 发件箱: 2008年7月1日星期二 上午 3:45:24 GMT+0800 Asia/Kuala_Lumpur 主题: LFB library Hello all, What is the overall status of the LFB library? Joel was kind enough to point me to draft-halpern-forces-lfblibrary-vpn-00.txt, but I am also interested to know if there are other LFB definitions floating around out there. Is it possible to reuse aspects of NPF FAPIs to accelerate the formation of an LFB library? I am guessing that this was discussed at one point, but I was not around for the discussion. Regards, Aron