IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] A few comments on draft-bryan-ftp-hash-05

Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com> Mon, 26 July 2010 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE97B3A68E6 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.217, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Thuj4BIfjcP1 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A413A68DB for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk6 with SMTP id 6so1505953pzk.31 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=TNiVbhwv3YYY/gqniUxfGUqFqCi8JNaIC0F7uxLriF4=; b=KhhzfN4F7Z9W4dvh1NqbNbesUg15sD9BqW5xrWJFNR52xBOhYKGtxuJsrz9+IpPFSS QD8Lx6hAoDuIv9NDxlPnEsPz6VLiqMN83h1wM3ruVP5h2JJRIMYH6+/SRWWnO4XAgyR8 B+rKXehxUfMPRJeZwQw9kWRN6F90Vh4jOU3Z8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rWCkwxKP8DhC8hH/W6cqI9QD+u0tw4JpnBRG/Mo+FM/JWewXGdnqtVeD2lj3ch852/ ROtEr9FGBooT73nTlqqwBcD6qokOABSP+GoY2IBpvTSQcEJztyEv6g52i+EDQKGOnpCW cWSrasoTr8r63tNKs8szXgt+dqPZic4Qcmonc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.215.8 with SMTP id n8mr9380573wfg.122.1280169033887; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.159.143 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4C4CA182.2070601@filezilla-project.org>
References: <OF5B8F7FAC.BDF21341-ON80257752.00272796-80257752.002FC71F@uk.ibm.com> <4C2F1B7A.2040707@filezilla-project.org> <AANLkTinkcSl8PaGIQpJtGPfgGds5MvjXyxZYo1bJVDrJ@mail.gmail.com> <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C3685A295@TK5EX14MBXC129.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <4C3CEB60.1040903@filezilla-project.org> <A5FC996C3C37DC4DA5076F1046B5674C3685A430@TK5EX14MBXC129.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <OFA92E0E77.3E3C9F3D-ON80257761.00251D7F-80257761.002557F5@uk.ibm.com> <4C4CA182.2070601@filezilla-project.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:30:33 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTikwv=BU4qe_EUAtZ0ALVE1Ok9nOXaiYM1MPXLWj@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
To: Tim Kosse <tim.kosse@filezilla-project.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ftpext] A few comments on draft-bryan-ftp-hash-05
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:30:19 -0000

On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Tim Kosse
<tim.kosse@filezilla-project.org> wrote:
> On 2010-07-15 08:56, Paul Ford-Hutchinson wrote:
>
>> I propose that this draft specifically excludes HASH over a directory
>> (i.e. returns a 4xy error)
>
> Yes. Intuitively I would have implemented HASH without directory
> support, but I concur that it needs to be explicitly mentioned in the draft.

the draft says this already:

"The pathname argument MUST represent a file path, not a directory path."

what should we add?

further, Tim adds that this would be a permanent negative completion
(5yz) instead of transient negative completion (4yz) and suggests 553.

-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email