[ftpext] RFC 1639 to Historic
Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Fri, 01 July 2011 03:40 UTC
Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF5C21F8658 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWREGeTtKatO for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C97B21F864A for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so3634605fxe.27 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bhmYd133owpEbEsGeLYqqAWXgCNpoHny8rNwLV5PQ+g=; b=hwhT9MgfuF0cxE5OucoRseJxx0GjM5RqyHDVcJZmDdu1JlPVTgpRCNpaRucQ+1BfCN Es+w2lxTiZfChbTC/c2LbOLYoDAZQexCHYBReVPXcK05UFWuCR748SZFZ2f6wO9WXlkY rucRreFTRUDbao31U3SyAzal47IthaY5QHeMU=
Received: by 10.223.75.139 with SMTP id y11mr4192147faj.133.1309491633623; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r10sm2040067fah.26.2011.06.30.20.40.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E0D41DE.4010603@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:41:18 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "ftpext@ietf.org" <ftpext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ftpext] RFC 1639 to Historic
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:40:47 -0000
Hello, RFC 1639 specified FTP Operations Over Big Address Records (FOOBAR). With creation of the registry for FTO command per RFC 5797, the LPRT and LPSV commands specified there were designated as historical - 'h' in Conformance column (see http://www.iana.org/assignments/ftp-commands-extensions/ftp-commands-extensions.xml). Therefore, it would be logical to move RFC 1639 and its predecessor - RFC 1545 - to Historic, which RFC 5797 failed to do. Any thoughts on this? Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- [ftpext] RFC 1639 to Historic Mykyta Yevstifeyev