IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [gaia] Uplink?

Ermanno Pietrosemoli <ermanno@gmail.com> Thu, 12 February 2015 08:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ermanno@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF371A1B5A for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AuZtR4bNMpOP for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8261A0055 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q59so8546407wes.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1qH3Bg20ushvDRi7s9QI0QMqj/8aBqKfa8nGCDsQx0Y=; b=ayW5WOvN/9O4KWHnHfwV+TMv+LKeSTN1i7Ce1VVnI7c/ETb7cyQYfOZpeR0shYNLrl y5PNuFQxRcNYL/U29Rxrlar4lKi/02Ye+UKOWHBkqtLuH+EbF0doMNjwSm7Lxr/Iuh+O dfHzjFzkqgzsp91DMEozhwgsWwPDrYYVW+0l0W4QwHSeHXWpIHz8v7caxUSZ0vcsVzoh U/OUlMgBCrjXM8eaQvnjCAbJDUwxTPz7s58X+B+5RkvvB+CffJDYrv48RizUFkWIOAas s+gzV9+zXYn6on9M6byf5/WmmcAj0cFedeDhIetrt9bqCRxvU0BCCagUlEUtCF6JtLoG Wq+g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.20.238 with SMTP id q14mr3678294wie.51.1423730438127; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.58.203 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:40:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0ADCB19B1B24A64C8DC0F9AEE06214CE5050C413@nkgeml506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <0ADCB19B1B24A64C8DC0F9AEE06214CE5050BAF0@nkgeml506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <002501d045e7$3e2af930$ba80eb90$@unizar.es> <0ADCB19B1B24A64C8DC0F9AEE06214CE5050C413@nkgeml506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:40:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+qwFJk-9HMTM=Ff+gAe5jEn7at0M5zDLG=4q+jnAaFab=4vdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ermanno Pietrosemoli <ermanno@gmail.com>
To: "Miaofuyou (Miao Fuyou)" <fuyou.miao@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec53f34470544d3050ee013fd"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/91VskHtnWy-fBWTXY7heJpMAGM4>
Cc: "gaia@irtf.org" <gaia@irtf.org>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Uplink?
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://irtf.org/mail-archive/web/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:40:43 -0000

Hi,
Actually the uplink was considered in the very introduction of the document
(page 3), albeit with the name of Internet backhaul. Staring on page 11 a
brief description of the actual technologies involved is provided, touching
on wireless long distance that is obviously for uplink, although without
explicitely mentioning it. In page 14 the requirements for long links are
described.

Perhaps your concern can be accommodated by explitcitely inser the uplink
word in the introduction in page 3....

Best,

Ermanno

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:21 AM, Miaofuyou (Miao Fuyou) <
fuyou.miao@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Jose,
>
> Thanks for your response, my reply inline.
>
> > In these cases, we could explicitly say that the connection shared by
> means
> > of Wi-Fi is a residential one (e.g. DSL).
>
> Sorry for overlooking this. Sure, it is obvious in crowdshared scenario.
>
> >
> > 5.2.1.2.  Access to the Internet
> >
> > 5.2.1.2.1.  Web browsing proxies
> >
> > Is this your point?
>
> Probably not. My intention is about the connectivity level, rather than
> service level. I am more interested (concerned) in the connectivity for the
> alternative network to Internet, including the technology (wire, optics,
> FSO, microwave etc), the cost/affortability, the availability (imagine a
> distant village).
>
> - Miao
>
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: gaia [mailto:gaia-bounces@irtf.org] En nombre de Miaofuyou (Miao
> > Fuyou)
> > > Enviado el: miércoles, 11 de febrero de 2015 7:50
> > > Para: gaia@irtf.org
> > > Asunto: [gaia] Uplink?
> > >
> > >
> > > Just went through the mailing list archive and
> > draft-manyfolks-gaia-community-
> > > networks, and found almost nothing about uplink. Uplink is the
> > connectivity from the
> > > alternative network to the Internet. It is as important to alternative
> > network as the
> > > access technology (WiFi, OpenRNC etc), and I believe it accounts for a
> > large part
> > > of expense and deployment challenge.
> > >
> > > What is the status quo for uplink?
> > >
> > > - Miao
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gaia mailing list
> > > gaia@irtf.org
> > > https://irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>



-- 
Professor Ermanno Pietrosemoli
Telecommunications/ICT for Development Laboratory (T/ICT4D)
Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, GGH, Via Beirut
7, Trieste 34151 Italy
ermanno@ictp.it       http://wireless.ictp.it
-------
Presidente
Fundación Escuela Latinoamericana de Redes (EsLaRed)
www.EsLaRed.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email