Re: [gaia] 0xE arth IPv6 addessing

"jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Wed, 03 January 2024 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=17323ed0a8=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B85C05DDE7 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:26:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KUQhKNZBRo6B for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:26:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 483AFC05DDE5 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 00:26:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1704270391; x=1704875191; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=From:Message-Id: Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To: References; bh=b/tsRI7rKyubYYogSlHNOZz2Ci24tePZTonUnsSPkxs=; b=g 7KfJxFr6vtvrXrZObKWADCKwbn3IXExquMUR0jCB4lJPKAmV41/ljB0UzbpA8ERD 1kjfGWBnBnzVL63TnFC9u9fOGAvs1e7mzHT6FvWMzDgFycBzeFbmXQeOUT9nBqEN bMz+fh5sna6QFeWqjekNe4IPikxkAJcfU80V9L2e9k=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:26:31 +0100
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:26:00 +0100
Received: from smtpclient.apple by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50001347596.msg for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:25:59 +0100
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:70e4:b24e:7cd4:476c
X-MDHelo: smtpclient.apple
X-MDArrival-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:25:59 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=17323ed0a8=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: gaia@irtf.org
From: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Message-Id: <531E040D-CD0A-405F-B74C-CE6FE1E7D6A8@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0AC58CA9-804B-4BF0-9641-7E80965EFB66"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 09:25:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <80fQbCnuANJXHYcG7mNqWwAaOhp7Sr8a3s1ySgzy7xvyM3SX39rtuau6Reve1WH64esyArTHenLhyKY9_Ni496U5gnFVI-xHbXd6wU4icKY=@liberit.ca>
Cc: "arin-tech-discuss@arin.net" <arin-tech-discuss@arin.net>
To: Andrii Zvorygin <andrii@liberit.ca>, "gaia@irtf.org" <gaia@irtf.org>
References: <80fQbCnuANJXHYcG7mNqWwAaOhp7Sr8a3s1ySgzy7xvyM3SX39rtuau6Reve1WH64esyArTHenLhyKY9_Ni496U5gnFVI-xHbXd6wU4icKY=@liberit.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/YKIlIUmzxWJ3fpyYASG2Ge7hYuo>
Subject: Re: [gaia] 0xE arth IPv6 addessing
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:26:43 -0000

There is no such failure in the IPv6 deployment, over 50% of the Internet traffic is already using native IPv6. Transition (not migration) takes time. Yes, it should have been faster, but this is reality of business interest.

Regards,
Jordi

@jordipalet


> El 2 ene 2024, a las 14:06, Andrii Zvorygin <andrii@liberit.ca> escribió:
> 
> Hi All, 
> So as you all know IPv4 is long since exhausted, but our IPv6 transition has largely failed due address hoarding, and our networks are becoming increasingly brittle and fragile with a large preponderance of IP tunnels and NATs trying to stitch it together. Klaus Schwab is salivating over it all coming tumbling down almost on a weekly basis. Meanwhile even basic hosting services are getting ever more expensive and fleeing from affordability, due to the costs of managing the expensive insanity.
> 
> My proposal is that we allocate enough addresses for every region and subregion of the world now from the 0xE section of IPv6 addressing, free of charge. As a voluntary standard, allowing countries to migrate over without having to buy tiny little IPv6 tunnels from greedy wholesalers. IPv6 is supposed to be a native standard, not an overlay. 
> 
> basically the goal is to be able to allocate a /48 addresss for every person. 
> Every person is part of a family of around 6 people so 3bit leeway /45,
> IPv6 0xEarth addressing, for everyone to get a /48 subnet family of 6, 3bits, /45 
> church of 10 families, 4bits, /41 
> village of 6 church, 3 bits, /38 
> neighbourhood of 14 villages, 4 bits, /34 
> city of 11 neighbourhoods, 4 bits, /30 
> county of 13 cities, 4 bits, /26 
> province of 6 counties, 3 bits, /23 
> country of 5 provinces, 3 bits, /20 
> union of 16 countries, 4 bits, /16 
> (sub)continent of 16 unions, 4 bits, /12 
> planet of 16 (sub)contients, 4 bits, /8
> 
> And can use another 4 bits for leeway, for those places that have extra administrative units, 
> or with mega cities, getting it down to /4 for 0xE
> 
> In brief 0xE/4 can be allocated for Earth addresses, then 4 bits for continental powers,
> having more than 3.7 million km² of land or 370 million population, perhaps ordered by
> out of Africa expansion:
> 1. East Africa: Population 445 million, Area 6.3 million km².
> 2. Middle+South Africa: Population 246 million, Area 9.3 million km².
> 3. West Africa: Population 401 million, Area 5 million km².
> 4. North Africa: Population 246 million, Area 10.2 million km².
> 5. Middle East (Muslim/Arabic Nations): Population approximately 411 million, Area
> approximately 6.8 million km².
> 6. South Asia (India): Population 1.3 billion, Area 3.3 million km².
> 7. Southeast Asia: Population 655 million, Area 4.5 million km².
> 8. Oceania (including Australia): Population 42 million, Area 8.5 million km².
> 9. East Asia (China/Japan): Population 1.5 billion, Area 10 million km².
> 10. Europe: Population 741 million, Area 10 million km².
> 11. Russia (North Eurasia): Population 146 million, Area 17 million km².
> 12. Canada: Population 38 million, Area 9.98 million km².
> 13. USA: Population 331 million, Area 9.63 million km².
> 14. Latin America(without Brazil): Population 441 million, Area 11.6 million km².
> 15. Brazil: Population 215 million, Area 8.52 million km².
> 116. Antarctica: Population 2 thousands, Area 14.2 million km².
> 
> then 4 bits for Unions, or major sub divisions, such as if taking example of Canada An
> IPv6 Union has up to 370 million people or 3.7 million km², and an IPv6 ”country” has up
> to 21 million people or 216 thousand km².
> 1. Alberta Union: Population - 4.37 million, Area - 661,848 km²
> 2. Atlantic Union, Population 2.4 million, Area 540,000 km²:
> (a) Prince Edward Island: Population - 159,000, Area - 5,684 km²
> (b) Nova Scotia: Population - 977,000, Area - 55,284 km²
> (c) New Brunswick: Population - 779,000, Area - 72,908 km²
> (d) Newfoundland and Labrador: Population - 521,000, Area - 405,212 km²
> 3. British Columbia Union: Population - 5.07 million, Area - 944,735 km²
> 4. Manitoba Union: Population - 1.37 million, Area - 647,797 km²
> 5. Ontario Union: Population - 14.57 million, Area - 1,076,395 km²
> 6. Quebec Union: Population - 8.49 million, Area - 1,542,056 km²
> 7. Saskatchewan Union: Population - 1.17 million, Area - 651,036 km²
> 8. Northwest Territories: Population - 45,000, Area - 1,346,108 km²
> 9. Nunavut: Population - 39,000, Area - 2,093,190 km²
> 10. Yukon: Population - 41,000, Area - 482,443 km²
> 
> And so on it can break down to the smallest level, potentially down to the hectare,
> and there would be plenty of addresses for everyone.
> 
> What do you think?
> -- 
> Andrii (Logan) Zvorygin,
> Lyis Food Forestry https://lyis.ca
>  <https://lyis.ca/>Global Distributist https://distributist.org <https://distributist.org/>
> LiberIT Liberty Information Technology Services http://liberit.ca
>  <http://liberit.ca/>
> We All are One Being https://1being.org <https://1being.org/>
> Encrypted email key fingerprint: BABA 36D9 8956 A9EA 0C5E (pubkey <https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/67190E17BEE5026A01CFBABA36D98956A9EA0C5E>)
> I am a piece of dust, on a planet, in a vast cosmos, within One Infinite Creation.
> As I found you, I leave you glorying in the love and in the light of the One Infinite Creator. Go forth therefore rejoicing in the Power and in the Peace of the One Infinite Creator.
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.