IETF Logo Mail Archive

[gaia] Community Networks special issue of Computer Networks journal

Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> Sun, 10 April 2016 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mmitar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2613512D595 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XnGcXPJg7uze for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x243.google.com (mail-ig0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9769B12D0CD for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x243.google.com with SMTP id kb1so7417539igb.3 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GW8aWsXcKLTLjRnJS1qDO6a902gJenTcxHk3438iVlk=; b=iX0jBjgumRHg7KGBXW7VhqslLiUmpWnKnBoBopQD8diUWgRllsNf75xpyhB1Io4kfD cROtkngJkZ5D3qN9yvmVrBo72FlsncPIVgVdLmKkS7+TzhKvh+CaDAq6Jv8oq1yulBuq SOJa6CrwZXi55mcoGIFAEwPT1UoIlKrPoG91Q5+mKXLre1vHC9WKESmvwegqfZPBgpkZ sw7+hxC70fu8wbQI7HM0nSxjC5bvrW0ly1gmra0FIkFXSHY4SwBMpz9O5j4zjG1fYE4G n/T5q+0ZS6qwIzBW0LEqWMK84sz4RI4BhNXVFzRhLv3Vmk0MglmTjkalO5ZJ1W+WK7P4 o67w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GW8aWsXcKLTLjRnJS1qDO6a902gJenTcxHk3438iVlk=; b=js0M39MacbSMwVRCOVSN8Q8ietJYpcDCw473A3LAVOkNUPCHVM5gBfD2M4xFksJIQX thGKElVBAkMmKw61xaD0hoOb0X7aof2n3LP8oy4V+msJwU4926vc+ZJIgwlNy6iEtinv WOvm/ljs+5lq3e7SS6ao/F5vjrrfbWC/1Fw5dnHIfehDNAgBKdkpn4jJHTLz9BdvliwK DQhWF7SAswbKF0gO45zFhVSxUCtkZEF3bcJ37QjgPHqgSA68CTlrpm3uSgA6IO9xTWgz 1jky0G9uEE+ans2MLrhM7MDQTNOzIMi+1EyeEsj9Z7J6u4OisLh7IYZRjYp6UqNQcy87 3FFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVZMSTqnmluJcW7sMLNfjNGOmh/Huub/JEUWxSjSjZX8/lCOgP1kz+82GBv0/xdey/B2byYTDtwl0kzEg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.108.49 with SMTP id hh17mr3641947igb.31.1460262843994; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.13.76 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 21:34:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKLmikNHGa59eZbW_OafWsWhgEWX+TYiev22ZfTLipNQD1wsCg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
To: gaia@irtf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/isZJ3VIdnRXro2FkTdWGAvwdVys>
Subject: [gaia] Community Networks special issue of Computer Networks journal
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 04:34:06 -0000

Hi!

While reading latest RFC draft I noticed it does not cite any of the
papers from the Community Networks special issue of Computer Networks
journal:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13891286/93/part/P2

I suspect that maybe it was missed because it is fairly recent? But I
think articles very much address many questions the RFC draft is
trying to address as well: what are recent organizational and
technical advancements in community networks and their deployments.

I would urge editors to read through papers and see how to integrate
information from those papers into the RFC. I will continue reading
the RFC myself and try to find cases where papers would help as well.


Mitar

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email