Re: [gaia] Promoting more discussion on GAIA mailing list

Esther Jang <ether@uw.edu> Fri, 17 February 2023 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ether@uw.edu>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BCBC152564 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:33:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0aYi4519P-TY for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00641c01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00641c01.pphosted.com [205.220.165.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96729C169528 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0247472.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00641c01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 31H1XcDA015818 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 01:33:51 GMT
Received: from mxout24.cac.washington.edu (mxout24.cac.washington.edu [140.142.234.158]) by mx0a-00641c01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3nt01br07u-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <gaia@irtf.org>; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 01:33:50 +0000
Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.234.157]) by mxout24.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW20.07/8.14.4+UW22.04) with ESMTP id 31H1WTvQ008942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:32:29 -0800
X-Auth-Received: from mail-qv1-f41.google.com (mail-qv1-f41.google.com [209.85.219.41]) (authenticated authid=ether@uw.edu) by smtp.washington.edu (8.16.1+UW21.10/8.14.4+UW19.10) with ESMTPSA id 31H1WSWD006172 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:32:29 -0800
X-UW-Orig-Sender: ether@smtp.washington.edu
Received: by mail-qv1-f41.google.com with SMTP id n9so2924068qvs.7 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:32:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUsVWsOYVEuogk/ZpKiD7mKh5Ga7OdZM79eun9PfVxTY/X0MKJv +9t7MiT2b93LFeZ53yUY+m6c8LQj77wBpeD4WCRl0g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+6qW9qwqxHD8WHDQeagFqxSYncR/wD219YC6UvPWBM4fHQRczzRsfsCFy6gRa45l3Jwt+D9HnKUqWizSkwHZg=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e211:0:b0:56e:bb0f:ec55 with SMTP id q17-20020a0ce211000000b0056ebb0fec55mr769189qvl.29.1676597548457; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:32:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB+4MyRTjaXYV7LZ-6R-XCqXA5amL9x6j5oJ4EfndbPYPaCnEQ@mail.gmail.com> <1C938501-DB16-4581-9C30-D614900A6BE0@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1C938501-DB16-4581-9C30-D614900A6BE0@uchicago.edu>
From: Esther Jang <ether@uw.edu>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:32:17 +0800
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAFcJ7OHHEkrBpfzmDyofGRBnKgZSNdT8CVChza1FM6sbOOUwOg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAFcJ7OHHEkrBpfzmDyofGRBnKgZSNdT8CVChza1FM6sbOOUwOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Feamster <feamster@uchicago.edu>
Cc: Kurtis Heimerl <kheimerl@cs.washington.edu>, "gaia@irtf.org" <gaia@irtf.org>, Jane Coffin <jane@connecthumanity.fund>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004eba7605f4db49cc"
X-Proofpoint-GUID: SbjN3LN-eKrEdxu33oMkZn5mJpOLMOWR
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: SbjN3LN-eKrEdxu33oMkZn5mJpOLMOWR
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.930,Hydra:6.0.562,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-02-16_18,2023-02-16_01,2023-02-09_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2302170011
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/lzrTmwwPjRlWuM2kF0fNoXWRdKU>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Promoting more discussion on GAIA mailing list
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 01:33:55 -0000

Discord!

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:36 AM Nick Feamster <feamster@uchicago.edu> wrote:

> Slack!
>
> > On Feb 16, 2023, at 6:20 PM, Kurtis Heimerl <kheimerl@cs.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello GAIA!
> >
> > As we approach IETF 116, Jane Coffin and I, the GAIA chairs, have been
> > discussing potential ways to increase interesting discussion on this
> > mailing list. We both pine for a time when we both learned and shared
> > here (as well as other similar lists such as Change, TIER,
> > LiberationTech, and others) and have found venues such as this to be
> > influential in our careers and thinking. In short, it would be nice to
> > have some more discussion here, specifically technical discussions and
> > experience sharing about global connectivity efforts.
> >
> > Technical mailing lists, such as GAIA, have largely had lower traffic
> > over COVID, both as people are engaged in less "global" action and the
> > rise of competing mechanisms for communication (e.g., slack, discord,
> > etc). We'd like to kick of a discussion here, to be continued at IETF
> > 116, on:
> >
> > 1) Should we adopt such platforms (and if so, which) in order to help
> > build a more involved community around GAIA?
> > 2) If not, what can we do to encourage more discussion (instead of
> > just forwards and announcements) on GAIA?
> >
> > So GAIA members, what do you think?
> >
> > --
> > Website: https://kurti.sh/
> > Public Key: https://flowcrypt.com/pub/kheimerl@cs.washington.edu
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gaia mailing list
> > gaia@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
>