[Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03

Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Thu, 24 July 2014 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E221A000E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgHY3tRWHZ9z for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE7B1A0030 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n12so2872322wgh.9 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/qNCGL6fJzQMpvc+1XvH6tAD87vD3YbgSQP1aX3joHA=; b=E+gIjCVGVjEP67rzQWbvTdL5aA6UuPFkGaC7mJpGKDRiZB+B4TVD47wrmBLffzqusY +t1FDJX+I5dFNzRMB0ovLTW3nO5557lpfV9FxwWrpiW8ZT7KfrqMRCY+U7nt6Zi4GIIz Dgg/OOfdGBdsV40dC9iFrLTWeLU5KKkn8kpx8tJY3k/FFhogmOw6lVMTwWoWtbsNqKjA m/5rNv1zEXH1i70mbWLYfgME5d2mmnoQlGReGEYBGOjYTyrjAaKB/vYot2LDhH5UKrSB mBNnF9b9wcmjqHjpa4dDAoCYQXg8xjL6sW9nEYZTihgYxlYn/nC4JW4Frz5Hv1RM/VzO SlSA==
X-Received: by 10.180.14.5 with SMTP id l5mr13747613wic.50.1406211577756; Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:168:2413:1763:1147:63df? ([2001:67c:370:168:2413:1763:1147:63df]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lb3sm16263507wjc.30.2014.07.24.07.19.36 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:19:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53D115F5.20803@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 10:19:33 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03.all@tools.ietf.org, Gen Art <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/12ysMSa1EjtAlR2qsAztdwpGwXE
Subject: [Gen-art] Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 14:19:47 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis-03
Reviewer: Tom Taylor
Review Date: 24 July 2014
IETF LC End Date: 29 July 22014
IESG Telechat date: (if known)

Summary: This is one of the best-written IETF documents I have ever 
read. I have identified no issues, but have only a surface understanding 
of DNS. Hence I cannot pronounce on the technical accuracy of the 
document beyond saying that it is consistent with
draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname-04.

Major issues: none.

Minor issues: none.

Nits/editorial comments: none.