[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03.txt

I'm fine with the -04 version.

Thanks

    Brian

On 2007-10-29 10:14, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
> or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-scanning-implications-03.txt
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review Date:  2007-10-29
> IETF LC End Date: none
> IESG Telechat date: 2007-11-01
> 
> Summary: Ready, one query
> 
> Comments:
> 
> Substantive:
> 
> Section 3.2
>    ... It is also worth noting that
>    the reverse DNS tree may also expose address information.  In such
>    cases, populating the reverse DNS tree for the entire subnet, even if
>    not all addresses are actually used, may reduce that exposure.
> 
> Doesn't this suggest that it's OK to publish 2^64 bogus PTR records
> for every subnet?
> 
> By the way:
> 
> I've tracked this draft in the WG. As the writeup says "The working 
> group process was uneventful." I recall relatively little discussion 
> or contention. 
> 
> There was one short comment thread by Jonne Soinenen and myself
> that didn't get implemented, but it doesn't seem to justify
> action at this stage - see
> http://ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2007/msg00325.html
> http://ops.ietf.org/lists/v6ops/v6ops.2007/msg00326.html

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art