[Gen-art] GenART Review: draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-04.txt
"Michael A. Patton" <MAP@MAP-NE.com> Thu, 06 July 2006 06:11 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyN54-0004j1-N0; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:11:18 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyN53-0004iw-DS for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:11:17 -0400
Received: from outside.tutakai.map-ne.com ([69.25.196.14] helo=Mail.MAP-NE.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyN52-0008GY-5c for gen-art@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:11:17 -0400
Received: by Mail.MAP-NE.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id B13C03F74B; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 02:11:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: gen-art@ietf.org
From: "Michael A. Patton" <MAP@MAP-NE.com>
Message-Id: <20060706061115.B13C03F74B@Mail.MAP-NE.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:11:15 -0400
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
Cc: dnelson@enterasys.com, dromasca@avaya.com
Subject: [Gen-art] GenART Review: draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Attached is my review of the specified document, submitted as part of the Gen-ART process. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Document Tag: draft-ietf-radext-rfc2618bis-04.txt Document Title: RADIUS Authentication Client MIB for IPV6 Intended Status: Proposed Standard Shepherding AD: Dan Romascanu This is a followup on my review of an earlier version (-03) ---------------- Begin review ---------------- Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a [type] RFC ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following editorial issue is noted for the convenience of possible copy editors but is not part of the technical review. The authors can probably just mention it to the RFC Editor, who may well notice it anyway... Typos ----- The typo I noticed in the -03 draft is still there. Proper english usage calls for a comma after the word "extensions" in the third sentence of the abstract. _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] GenART Review: draft-ietf-radext-rfc261… Michael A. Patton