Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-11

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 24 August 2015 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D371A8849 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vp5AOQ2FoaSu for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com (mail-oi0-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3D01A0094 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oiey141 with SMTP id y141so86044690oie.1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cOdRPRtgE/9FuTJRcgejPhWhsW+SV9oVVsPW21kQBsc=; b=VFCeGUBYd2sseiCYHbEOCkrtZjDglk0qkm50VNlQcExMYD7FEQbFyctN5c0zk5yyw5 r+3twI6YXHb+ZT3Sg121BcHsWVImNl3/9cIeKd596xa8AUJc4lxvgEskjsXzZazfDgZQ 7S5eyfSvECZUrzYYMUlt8tI9lDoZOEuWRda/bXCNF31qnoP/5kTw9SMUessRCC8zgjHf AFFyqc2MQPeBiiWu+ovh0iOdVq6nM1DTGO9x3X2Upw4acN0eE3hOzgnZVf67SGvH49gI fdujHoHbn4p5Tzr26VcN9l484RWHxc0yY1YSqxd1iBl8rWeqWePlpPCKbqlHws7KG2Td qSIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlVbABosE4G6tWHnoaFDy3MtS8hyV+HuHFJ/7/JKGPfPWAQtFvBZoi26SAr/shRt+vLSK3j
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.195.71 with SMTP id t68mr21207429oif.117.1440441726160; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.174.144 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B379E803E@ESESSMB208.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B379E803E@ESESSMB208.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:42:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iK5=rMJP_-ewgYBOhaBUY4K0gshHj8JaAR2qz1iy9tQrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e2406686d33051e12f9c5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/3d8Go-qSGgV0tr35tVyQPriiusg>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-11
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:42:12 -0000

On Thursday, August 20, 2015, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
>
> Document:
> draft-ietf-dnsop-negative-trust-anchors-11
>
> Reviewer:                                    Christer Holmberg
>
> Review Date:                              20 August 2015
>
> IETF LC End Date:                      23 June 2015
>
> IETF Telechat Date:                   9 July 2015
>
> Summary:         My previous comments on the previous version of the
> document have been addressed, and the document is now ready for
> publication.
>
> Major Issues: None
>
> Minor Issues: None
>
> Editorial Issues: None
>
>
Just a quick note to say thank you for your review (and again for the
earlier comments)

W


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf