[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-attribute-03.txt
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com> Mon, 15 December 2008 17:37 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37D13A697F; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:37:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22FB3A6984 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:37:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pK3wU9PZia5G for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:37:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr1.ericy.com (imr1.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B00A3A697F for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se (eusrcmw751.exu.ericsson.se [138.85.77.51]) by imr1.ericy.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBFHfOvp004557; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:41:27 -0600
Received: from eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se ([138.85.77.50]) by eusrcmw751.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:37:40 -0600
Received: from [142.133.10.113] ([142.133.10.113]) by eusrcmw750.eamcs.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 11:37:40 -0600
Message-ID: <494695FE.2040505@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:38:06 -0500
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-attribute@tools.ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Dec 2008 17:37:40.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4387B90:01C95EDB]
Cc: softwire-ads@tools.ietf.org, softwire-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-attribute-03.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-softwire-bgp-te-attribute-03.txt For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard but I have a few comments. Major ===== Section 5: Impact on scalability * This document states that "Use of Traffic Engineering Attribute does not increase the number of routes" but I am not sure if this is true. Say I have a route 200.0.2.0/24 with a TE attribute field X and a route 200.0.3.0/24 with TE attribute field Y. Without the TE attribute these could have been aggregated to a 200.0.2.0/23, but with the attribute, they cannot be. Am I reading this wrong? Minor ===== Section 3 * This document does not define whether Switching Capability-specific information is included when the switching cap field is set to Fiber Switch Capable (FSC) Cheers Suresh _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-softwire-b… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-softwi… Hamid Ould-Brahim