[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Wed, 01 July 2015 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990991B2E7D; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yGJWdeudqAlf; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334AD1B2E7B; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgqq4 with SMTP id q4so43447285wgq.1; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=+oClAxYK8X54zXk5JK4kpy0mUqu82Hqph8tCdvwoKv0=; b=Ocfew6+8v0+NJMGGO1TW2y/jeK/M+Tz2V8pfF+h/ngc0poeAe39fgDqPv8CeL/epQD tiT/PKZDo0i7qaWHoI92Z5lB/qkMRxoqcflBIQrC0GYCiq7qxL8r6smbBQ693wCKvYlR OAFz9H6dF41QmJ3bIgrGQDju0ZOI9fLn3PzRsmRucErfkBdWdj60JH1EH0rECIx53lud MTfnyrWkw/4vTSUF7eNEuP/LvUAJUMx98jSm5prIZUld2StpYAEY2qEGmw0XvWVfvmpV AgQLwZ3/sbDfc9eCLyQoy7sRU3NAUwz834aTzExg3+Y3Ey02Wk+iLAt9lM/gfmlyyuzZ i4fg==
X-Received: by 10.194.6.37 with SMTP id x5mr55402567wjx.73.1435773755759; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-180-204-77.red.bezeqint.net. [79.180.204.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm3997394wja.40.2015.07.01.11.02.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jul 2015 11:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth.all@tools.ietf.org
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 21:02:31 +0300
Message-ID: <0d5201d0b428$1b604590$5220d0b0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0D53_01D0B441.40AE19D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdC0KBlUGzYDbjPTQ6mmZY/wic7VtQ==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/4uGnrm9dA7UCrD40RoQc-C2Jaxc>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 18:02:39 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-ietf-bmwg-issu-meth-01
Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date: 2015-7-1

IETF LC End Date: 2015-7-2

IESG Telechat date: 

 

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational  RFC.

 

 

Major issues:

 

Minor issues:

 

According to the abstract this document specifies a set of common
methodologies and procedures designed to characterize the overall behavior
of a Device Under Test (DUT), subject to an ISSU event. My reading is that
it captures the typical procedures and as such is an informational document.
It does not recommend any specific procedure yet it RECOMMEND in section 7
defines normative recommendation of which parameters SHOULD be reported in
what I understand is a written statement.  I was wondering if all parameters
are needed and when you can report only part of them , maybe just make it
non normative 

 

Nits/editorial comments: