Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14

"Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303541A0856; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72HXq9fmktQi; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932BF1A064C; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:19:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3110; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1450282773; x=1451492373; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=vhzkrg+mPeo6OQ70WygQwbPMDfIaVjXGoNgSbL+jmjA=; b=aPpp1Iv6FhU3xH5yn+8daTv+L9badNTwUzANnx6WY+vv3zTUoFIWTpR2 9PgWld0aELZ8LZV4itBtYseG3diVD5zK1Fa2E0Ys0NePLVxKSKcB8e6Th ry+sglWvA/YPPVXoUfXPrPBS7PNo5Ns4b2ipq/rBK0ogucZUV+PDbjzGP E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CwAgAZjnFW/4kNJK1egzpSbQa9ZA6BY4YNAoEpOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqENAEBAQMBeQULAgEIGC4yJQIEDgUOiBkIvkUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPCYZWAYIOgm6IJoEaAQSHV4cSiBMBgmyBYoh5gVyXS4NzAR8BQ4QEcoNZgQgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,437,1444694400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="56002259"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 16 Dec 2015 16:19:32 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tBGGJWlY023802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:19:32 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:19:31 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com ([173.36.7.26]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:19:31 -0600
From: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14
Thread-Index: AQHRMsLYrQtNSpsnWUeyZsZLFZDKgZ7OMT6AgAAI5gA=
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:19:31 +0000
Message-ID: <F7561C2E-AB91-42FD-AA48-8CCD9AAD2606@cisco.com>
References: <800EE981-F2C3-4540-8653-8AEC63625E17@cisco.com> <5671879B.6090007@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <5671879B.6090007@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.131.118.30]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_329ECEA2-0984-400F-892F-FC4A77F82330"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/5Eg2MCANumSAOVmRtiHDPTbCfcA>
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth.all@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review for draft-ietf-httpauth-scram-auth-14
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:19:35 -0000

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:47 AM 12/16/15, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ralph,
> Thank you for your review. Sorry I missed it earlier.

You're welcome.  Looks like we have agreement on my editorial comments and suggestions.  Will the edits you mention below appear in rev -15?

- Ralph

> 
> On 09/12/2015 20:47, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> Nicely written, very clear document.
> Thank you.
>> idnits reports some lines too long and an unused reference.
> I fixed the reference in my copy. I hope RFC Editor can help with lines which are too long.
>> In the third paragraph of the Introduction, I suggest removing the parentheses and editing the second sentence for clarity; specifically, what is "SCRAM data"?
> I meant SCRAM requests and responses.
>> You could probably omit the parentheses in the second paragraph of Setion 3, as well, I'm likely just arguing style.
> Barry picked on this as well, so this was rewritten for clarity.
>> The last sentence of the last paragraph of sectino 3 was unclear to me: which messages are referred to?
> Message is the same as 'decoded "data" attribute' in the previous sentence. I clarified that.
>> I think, in the phrase "fail the authentication" in the fifth paragraph of section 8, you are using "fail" as a transitive verb, as in "the client considers the authentication of the message to have failed"
> ... and does whatever is appropriate in this case. Which might be closing the connection, retrying or trying another (non SCRAM) mechanism.
>> .  If I have that write, I suggest rewriting the containing sentence to improve the clarity.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
> 
>