Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm-05.txt
Mohamad Badra <badra@isima.fr> Fri, 23 January 2009 08:18 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37EE3A67FB; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:18:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C213A6920 for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.873
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.873 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.924, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, MANGLED_BEST=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ay3nlCxKsbYk for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sp.isima.fr (sp.isima.fr [193.55.95.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037483A67FB for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pc158.isima.fr [193.55.95.158]) by sp.isima.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0N9HZIE815216; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:17:38 GMT
Message-ID: <49797E30.1060503@isima.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:22:08 +0100
From: Mohamad Badra <badra@isima.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <DEF853BD-95D9-4021-9D46-7AD797C9E8C7@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DEF853BD-95D9-4021-9D46-7AD797C9E8C7@nostrum.com>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (sp.isima.fr [193.55.95.1]); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:17:38 +0000 (WET)
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm@tools.ietf.org, tls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm-05.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org Dear Robert Sparks,
Thank you for your review. > 1) In the applicability statement, consider pointing to (or moving forward) the statement in 4279. No Problem. I will add the following text to the "Applicability Statement" "The applicability statement in [RFC4279] applies to this document as well." > 2) The IANA considerations section should name the registry (btw - where are the instructions to IANA on how to choose the next numbers?) The ciphersuite values should be chosen from the Standards Action range. It is implicite since the document is intented to be ST. IMO, the above addition alone should not require a new draft version; it could be part of an RFC Editor comment in the IESG evaluation record being passed to the RFC-Ed (or even be performed in AUTH48). Best regards, Badra _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tls-psk… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tls… Mohamad Badra