IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipsec-tunnels-04.txt

rfgraveman@nac.net Fri, 19 January 2007 13:59 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7uHN-0001bw-VQ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:59:41 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7rYU-00031i-8i for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:05:10 -0500
Received: from smtp-out2.oct.nac.net ([209.123.233.212]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7rYT-0000NR-0d for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:05:10 -0500
Received: (qmail 23042 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jan 2007 06:05:08 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.nac.net) (209.123.118.212) by smtp.nac.net with SMTP; 19 Jan 2007 11:05:08 -0000
Received: from 67.85.164.222 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rfgraveman) by webmail.nac.net with HTTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:05:08 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <33491.67.85.164.222.1169204708.squirrel@webmail.nac.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701190813210.13731@sampo3.csc.fi>
References: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E055068B8B51@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0701190813210.13731@sampo3.csc.fi>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 06:05:08 -0500
From: rfgraveman@nac.net
To: Pekka Savola <psavola@funet.fi>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 08:59:41 -0500
Cc: david.kessens@nokia.com, fred.baker@cisco.com, hannes.tschofenig@siemens.com, gen-art@ietf.org, kurtis@kurtis.pp.se, mohanp@sbcglobal.net, rfg@acm.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipsec-tunnels-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Pekka,

This is fine. Editorially, I suggest:

>>  An important consideration in determining whether to use IPsec tunnel
>>  mode is whether the IPsec tunnel mode SA is modeled as an interface.
>>  This notion of interface is logical - any time a system, host or
s/ - /: /
>>  router, sends a datagram, it has to account for having done so using
>>  the RFC 2863 Interface MIB.  To do so, the system derives ifIndex from
>>  the route entry (see InetCidrRouteEntry in RFC 4292) that it uses to
>>  forward the   datagram, or from the IpDefaultRouterEntry described
s/the /the/
>>  in RFC 4293.  The management information accessed via the ifIndex
>>  is "the interface" from a management and configuration perspective.

Rich




_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email