[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Wed, 06 February 2019 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44420123FFD; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 23:10:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.91.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <154943705913.32195.5767358135257812709@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 23:10:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/7ICW9xMtSQ5XdfsqSZxHQaw3IAI>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:11:00 -0000

Reviewer: Erik Kline
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-??
Reviewer: Erik Kline
Review Date: 2019-02-05
IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat


Seems generally ready to go, but I have a few questions.  I apologize if these
don't many any sense in the proper context of this document.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:

[1] I assume the URIs in 6.3 are also meant to be deleted upon publication?

[2] WRT to the final lines of 5.1:

    [a] "Replace all references to RFC 5988 in that registry have been
    replaced..." doesn't scan well, I think.

    [b] If the IANA repo in question is
    https://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xhtml, I
    don't see any mention of 5988 in there.

[3] Naive question: do we want a statement about reserving/agreeing to never
allocate "example" in the .well-known space?