[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01
Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net> Tue, 30 June 2009 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@estacado.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAFB3A6CEB; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.192, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dl2zGLD3HTUT; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from estacado.net (estacado-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252803A69D6; Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (adsl-68-94-46-125.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [68.94.46.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by estacado.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n5ULufPL007615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:56:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@estacado.net)
Message-Id: <668F13F2-DD7F-4324-963D-1FD4B2F9C2EE@estacado.net>
From: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>
To: leo.vegoda@icann.org, michelle.cotton@icann.org, gih@apnic.net, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:56:36 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:56:55 -0000
(oops, forgot the gen-art list. Sorry for the repeat.) I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-iana-special-ipv4-registry-01 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2009-06-30 IETF LC End Date: 2009-07-01 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as an informational RFC. I have some minor comments that should be addressed first. Major issues: None. Minor issues: -- section 2, first paragraph: Text refers to [rfc3330bis] but there is no corresponding entry in the references section. -- section 3, 2nd paragraph: Is [date] supposed to be a reference? If so, there is no corresponding item in the references section. If not, then I don't understand the intent of "...in [date]..." -- section 3, third paragraph: Should RFC5226 be a normative reference? It's not clear to me if the text means to say "this draft follows the policies..." or "further allocations MUST follow the policies". If the second, it would require a normative reference. -- IANA considerations, 2nd to last paragraph: How does this relate to the ability to state routing scopes in item 7? Nits/editorial comments: -- section 2, paragraph 1: Should the "." be a ":"? -- References The entries [IANA] and [RFC2928] are not referred to in the body of the draft.
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-iana-special… Ben Campbell