[Gen-art] Re: Gen ART review of draft-ietf-avt-compact-bundled-evrc-09.txt

Hi, David, Colin,

...
>>
>> I don't like that idea - if there are interoperability issues here, they
>> need to be documented, but if there aren't interoperability issues 
here,
>> the MUST was probably wrong.  I would advise consulting your WG chairs
>> (and possibly the responsible AD) about the importance and potential
>> impact of this issue, as I'm not sufficiently expert to make the call.
>
> Qiaobing is the expert on this codec. As working group chair, I'm happy
> to go with his opinion on this issue. This seems like a minor issue,
> with no impact on the larger protocol design choices.
>

I agree with Colin. There is no impact on the protocol design here.

In the rather unlikely event (I can't still think of a reason for it to
happen) that someone wants to change the defaults, a new RFC (or a new
3GPP2 spec) probably will have to be created to not only specify the
exact changes, but also give meaningful analysis and address any
potential inter-op issues. Those discussions seems out of scope of this
RFC. That's the reason I propose to remove the misleading note.

regards,
-Qiaobing

> Colin
>
>

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art