RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt
"Stefan Santesson" <stefans@microsoft.com> Wed, 12 April 2006 17:14 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTivg-0002RV-8B; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:14:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTive-0002RQ-Vx for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:14:54 -0400
Received: from mail-eur.microsoft.com ([213.199.128.145]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTivd-0005Tx-JM for gen-art@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:14:54 -0400
Received: from EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com ([65.53.193.197]) by mail-eur.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:14:52 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 18:14:51 +0100
Message-ID: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA62994404A50C52@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <443CFDED.6090700@nortel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcZeM40nHztrH+XyQiK0hwVrl0GMYQAINvlA
From: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>
To: Tom-PT Taylor <taylor@nortel.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Apr 2006 17:14:52.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[9CC703F0:01C65E54]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 41c17b4b16d1eedaa8395c26e9a251c4
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
The updated draft 01 has amended the IANA considerations section requesting this number to be assigned. Stefan Santesson Program Manager, Standards Liaison Windows Security > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:taylor@nortel.com] > Sent: den 12 april 2006 15:18 > To: Stefan Santesson; Russ Housley > Cc: gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt > > Apologies to all for not following up earlier on one more item. In > section 2, the enum adding supplemental_data as a HandshakeType has > "TBD" for the value. I don't see an IANA registry for these values, so I > assume this has to be filled in at some point. > > Looking at draft-ietf-tls-rfc2246-bis-13.txt and comparing the > currently-assigned values to the order in which the messages occur in > the protocol, I conclude that the applicable value should lie between 3 > and 10. > > Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:5N00:EXCH] wrote: > > I was selected as General Area Review Team reviewer for this > specification > > (for background on Gen-ART, please see > > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html) > > > > Document: draft-santesson-tls-supp-00.txt > > Intended Status: Proposed Standard (Individual submission via AD) > > Shepherding AD: Russ Housley > > Review Trigger: IETF Last Call (ends 13 April 2006) > > > > Summary: This document is ready for Proposed Standard. I found one nit: > > > > In the second sentence of section 7 IANA Considerations, the term "TLS > > Authorization Data Format identifiers" is used. I believe that should be > > "TLS Supplemental Data Format identifiers". > > > > I note that RFC 2119 capitalization was used for protocol requirements, > > but requirements on other documents defining specific extensions used > > small letter "must". I would be interested to learn if this is accepted > > policy, since I have charge of an I-D that is defining requirements on > > other documents. > > > > Tom Taylor > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gen-art mailing list > > Gen-art@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > > > > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-tls-s… Tom-PT Taylor
- [Gen-art] RE: Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-t… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-t… Tom-PT Taylor
- RE: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-santesson-t… Stefan Santesson