IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 24 September 2013 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7902921F9A43; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:38:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9DLR5GZguaX; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A7521F90E5; Tue, 24 Sep 2013 14:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.9] (cpe-76-187-89-238.tx.res.rr.com [76.187.89.238]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8OLcX2F028308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:38:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN6rKmb6yvr+_S1j-E1Obieh1qtpQJYU0Lv9knS3pf6ntA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:38:35 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BC236CEC-DD18-4992-92C2-13298EB56EB5@nostrum.com>
References: <C563F76EA324474CA3722A35154AFDB364C40962@AZ-US1EXMB01.global.avaya.com> <CAHBDyN5SYiuB-0vscBK+nnfK9snykA+9riAT5qtqFrorjDo=aw@mail.gmail.com> <C563F76EA324474CA3722A35154AFDB364C409F6@AZ-US1EXMB01.global.avaya.com> <CAHBDyN6rKmb6yvr+_S1j-E1Obieh1qtpQJYU0Lv9knS3pf6ntA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 76.187.89.238 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@estacado.net>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, "Shekh-Yusef, Rifaat (Rifaat)" <rifatyu@avaya.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-yusef-dispatch-ccmp-indication-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:38:44 -0000

Hi Mary,

I similarly apologize for the delay in responding. It's been a busy week.

As I started to go over your responses one by one, I realized I had notated each one as WFM. So rather than send all that, I will summarize as "I agree with all of your responses, and updates to these effects will resolve all of my concerns."

Thanks!

Ben.

On Sep 16, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ben, 
> 
> I apologize for the delay in responding.  I had initially missed this review - it either got cached directly with gen-art reviews or the tools alias burped.  I'm not on the main IETF list with this email address.
> 
> Anyways, thank you very much for your thorough review.  Our responses are below [MB].
> 
> We have an update underway that addresses your's and other's LC comments.  We can forward that to you to preview if you would like.
> 
> Regards,
> Mary. 

[...]

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email