IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 10 July 2019 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFCF120300; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=qYlQ/kjv; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=LPxGGYEG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KWb6YIEzX0vz; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4981512067E; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 11:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D56020D3B; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:31:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:31:43 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=u K08//YcuApRRUyC/6NgH8eHqUQtqdZxewarU2p9aR8=; b=qYlQ/kjvKLUoQwS/+ 8H/WkJ59FU90jUCraaEqsUCv8V7r4HKCTfOUH42h57re0+J+mhHO62FqYVsQ3P9t 0EossEzqVDaJ2+0r1wO5a8/zhq9mhTzN7GdF2ONmy4gT8esTMni6YTUUQ4ajP1xG b8jUG1Xsf3dSpft8d6Grus0cjtYxDVP6ioifvM1yUDVQqF2qL70tOKFdi8JRNOZ6 aisZK7JN5m/17V+cfwxCg+58XTazOgficwOcmHgJCbglsLN8EoNGoxRMZgTbjC5/ JoRTC0ouZ1qN8eSYn76KyF3Z4WFPvtMBYyCSABTJTKoVFjWQprTLu93qW4PCmToO G4c/A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=uK08//YcuApRRUyC/6NgH8eHqUQtqdZxewarU2p9a R8=; b=LPxGGYEG0qQk7wKuGSWsBk9hH6vND9IXQ6krjrw68BUcRKXat1Rc/WPj/ M1clz2EwXE6EFYoE7Y4c/QEk728s0UHSvi8ygoc8b/ElCY0s2bSXXH7EmV3g+JOI fuEyAHUwr4+CD66P8VNQHaAdxa39mCVGhGK8rGLI/4T+Rxr6JxvgwYWSf70+NjIu ibG5RCZbGP5as7C+Ws1n6Birxij43FVwlb/n6H+hDHD2UdAEz3G36G+dqf41u0Tz MlvxxtLgy6aIH2M08XlTZO4HG+VCJGbx1TzieMV5Edz3bqkwvu60/DgWTvYZKCiW uArlMasuPeYVS/WO6NO+Os+YV9xkQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Di8mXfQQpQXjWSqF8Q6eahFw5w-Cu5jApDM4T6WQt9rhrbCwE18etQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrgeeigdduvdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurheptggguffhjgffgffkfhfvofesthhqmhdthhdtjeenucfhrhhomheptehlihhs shgrucevohhophgvrhcuoegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnqeenucffohhmrg hinhepihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrledunecurfgrrhgr mhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrgestghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Di8mXadSAMtGqq1gdzOUKoetBlZoZEkUVNnKF6zL3ltUy9SAptlkkA> <xmx:Di8mXUJ8urwF6_7YFSHSoebvW05R3rx-eNoxgYnk8JjrvQRx24N_Pw> <xmx:Di8mXXFS47_psDqb0fRbO4pQfIAeNEMViQLVCrveu3Hd68XTktghZQ> <xmx:Dy8mXcwOI_ufKG7lfOXW2731Ct7EMycWBx6BVdPCTv8gX9c1Na8_Ig>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.91]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7DAB680061; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:31:42 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <186FFE71-5935-43EF-9BE6-D66DA4118893@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:31:42 -0400
Cc: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pce-association-group.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-association-group.all@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1D817208-EF3D-441E-B037-24FC628D38E9@cooperw.in>
References: <5C3F7C31-9A25-4618-95B0-EF60AEAAB53A@ericsson.com> <CAB75xn45rsbw23z9T3EX0jyiiCAZ9BYN2ZqR16=-ag4ixTymqA@mail.gmail.com> <186FFE71-5935-43EF-9BE6-D66DA4118893@ericsson.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/AJwAmwp7GW-wh2CHZXp2d20B7Yk>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 18:31:49 -0000

Meral, thanks for your review. Dhruv, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa


> On Jun 6, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  Thanks for clarifying.
> 
> Best,
> Meral
> 
> On 6/5/19, 11:42 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Meral,
> 
>    Thanks for your review.
> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for extensions.
> 
>    Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context
>    of PCEP does not have any impact on the OAM. This association is in
>    the context of LSP path computation and does not impact the data
>    plane.
> 
>    Regarding the impact on path protection, it is best to discuss that in
>    the context of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection, where the
>    association-type for path protection is defined. That document is
>    under shepherd review and it would be wise to add some text there. I
>    have added the draft authors in cc to consider this.
> 
>    Regards,
>    Dhruv
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email