IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 06 June 2019 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502D0120182; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 23:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdS3w4Jgmv1R; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 23:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x136.google.com (mail-it1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D888A1200F7; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 23:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x136.google.com with SMTP id m3so1515538itl.1; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C96bxj/bEZ76vNajfW5V+MEFou1vRsEDT7GGgTz/jeU=; b=lbnA0eLKdE4kXNesXEQ01zOV6OizoJo3Fs13R3PDEQfk+wkPUhBRaX8Y1m4e6/rZNJ WGf6mpQbcdTuUlnDIiPvJtZl3i7dZ2Xu9gSLIeQzX81CImnOHJESrgwEQlxetnVPyuWF Ry61Y6+z1oL7Pullj6a1mLBdgUheteXZ7yUnUHBml4Gb5GN9qIpohPFZnNl0kJwf8iZ/ BT9Mp73auzLEZc2minN57V3dRXwemOjWr3Xw94mOWwvDuOrekbTEiytDMMgZ5A6CZOUv nEk0aJCUDg2bkRFa/shzsSO1vlaNnOGVGwh6TZ8M2iH64f0VMhUwz965x0afuwrGYGuY SGVA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C96bxj/bEZ76vNajfW5V+MEFou1vRsEDT7GGgTz/jeU=; b=ApB4jeHgzp92w/FrXRbQmHPkdYjrKm1EQS5Cn+WB7FLPbMijNZyQs65phEnT8FnqJR NjxwjozLaLRxeHOgZta4gfPKO1hN6S/uvlubQXDR+oUsrPGIST/9p2bZK6ZEKchVC6Fx e9q+cfSSswen+afvWjxaFEAMlib3XoWRGoDFfk6fQwWxE1aJ449eVV25YbVNI9uSpsdM MzEBipI8C2qSZrkzI2XvwizsPOXAGT06MExMipONMfv7EKDcp0HUIozufkwkIf8zJniP a3pIcfOX+sSd1tTsJRNsde/8tLrnD7Ns++BLmHM463/z9g+AmQgolMpXlFicqFPgD2fe Tgjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXSpzHpwYS31RG/u3RlFECEngkjfC5771y17WZF1BaLQO22Vz1X b4Uv9k7qDQZndVbrSnUqF+embqCvJ8h9/wMW2hk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQPgChZ3s8Ie4fCx3NPZpsR9DbLVsFj3pkslAeix2g2GDd6g8mJn81PGw+Ey5WyBZeuz3aOvkCjWPXO0AEAa0=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:5a06:: with SMTP id v6mr16240061ita.160.1559803347010; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5C3F7C31-9A25-4618-95B0-EF60AEAAB53A@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C3F7C31-9A25-4618-95B0-EF60AEAAB53A@ericsson.com>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 12:11:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn45rsbw23z9T3EX0jyiiCAZ9BYN2ZqR16=-ag4ixTymqA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-pce-association-group.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pce-association-group.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/NUythtWHWMFYWFRjsPJzFzxsxb0>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 06:42:30 -0000

Hi Meral,

Thanks for your review.

> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for extensions.

Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context
of PCEP does not have any impact on the OAM. This association is in
the context of LSP path computation and does not impact the data
plane.

Regarding the impact on path protection, it is best to discuss that in
the context of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection, where the
association-type for path protection is defined. That document is
under shepherd review and it would be wise to add some text there. I
have added the draft authors in cc to consider this.

Regards,
Dhruv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email