[Gen-art] RE: Gen ART review: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt

Black_David@emc.com Fri, 10 November 2006 15:50 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiYe6-0002TV-JX; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:50:22 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiYe5-0002RV-Bp for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:50:21 -0500
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiYe1-0006fk-Vt for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:50:21 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id kAAFoF6n011955 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:50:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id kAAFnko9019866 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:50:14 -0500 (EST)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.11]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:49:58 -0500
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 10:49:57 -0500
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E055068B8833@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B67531@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen ART review: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt
Thread-Index: Acbu/KMDqZaT3wEySfe5MrXBQEE54gV4x/0w
To: Black_David@emc.com, gen-art@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Nov 2006 15:49:58.0470 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFF14E60:01C704DF]
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.11.10.71432
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f4c2cf0bccc868e4cc88dace71fb3f44
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] RE: Gen ART review: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

Draft was "ready" as of GenART Last Call review.  It's still "ready".

Thanks,
--David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Black, David 
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 3:20 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org; 'Andy.Malis@tellabs.com'; 
> 'lmartini@cisco.com'; 'jeremy.brayley@ecitele.com'; 
> 'twalsh@juniper.net'
> Cc: Black, David; townsley@cisco.com; 'Stewart Bryant'; 
> 'Danny McPherson'
> Subject: Gen ART review: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt
> 
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pwe3-cell-transport-06.txt
> Reviewer: David L. Black
> Review Date: October 13, 2006
> IETF LC Date: Ends October 23, 2006
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
> 
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
> 
> Comments: This is a  short draft on how to make the ATM pseudo-wire
> encapsulation behave like an ATM network.  Most of the details
> are specified in the ATM pseudo-wire encapsulation draft, which
> is already in the RFC Editor's Queue.  One has to be familiar with
> ATM to completely understand this draft, which is acceptable.
> 
> The Intellectual Property Statement showed up in Section 1 - that
> was unexpected, but not necessarily something that needs to be
> changed.
> 
> By itself, this draft is in fine shape, but it's part of the
> overall congestion control (or rather lack thereof) situation
> for pseudo-wires, as this draft acknowledges in Section 5.
> Whether this draft should be held by the IESG as part of managing
> the pseudo-wire congestion control situation to an acceptable
> conclusion is up to the IESG.  As this is a General Area review,
> I recommend that the General Area Director support the Transport
> Area Directors on this topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> --David
> ----------------------------------------------------
> David L. Black, Senior Technologist
> EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
> +1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
> black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
> ----------------------------------------------------
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art