Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-05
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 11 March 2016 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4BF912D715; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:16:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mfci_xkTUQdn; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F4C12D619; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C80BE39; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:11:09 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JCdtFcYcEzQt; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:11:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.49.100] (unknown [86.46.23.221]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77E13BE29; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:11:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1457719865; bh=LUdMkXY3jtBemglVYOdJ6SSzUFjRn6HiTh+ykb0UZYw=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=rDdJi643pu3xsu5sejqDsWs7WmqaluQbWLbk7JeL5Q5klp4JSzyGFLwDL3yJz08Ib YWWK70Lk3QZxATxtsFpHqpWgJvam772YeYJiKw3WdOLKKviRD0fIyoy7vadDQqeQVi 6QOWjklBHASNy4+FEUp607RY4AqUiXEcjT/dyEVM=
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, General area reviewing team <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <56E308F3.6040008@dial.pipex.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56E30A32.6030306@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:10:58 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56E308F3.6040008@dial.pipex.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms020504020006070308040206"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/B6CQBfDZ4lWkMYSj7QN7GYiwZgA>
Cc: draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:16:59 -0000
2985 is a normative reference in 5750 which is standards track so I think we can safely claim precedent and I can put 2985 in the downref registry if nobody objects. Cheers, S. On 11/03/16 18:05, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-wallace-est-alt-challenge-05.txt > Reviewer: Elwyn Davies > Review Date: 2016/03/11 > IETF LC End Date: 2016/03/09 > IESG Telechat date: 2016/03/17 > > Summary: Ready with minor nits and a (new) downref issue for RFC 2985 > (importation of PKCS #9). Thanks for addressing my comments on -04 at > last call. > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > Downref issue: idnits identifies three downref issues: > - RFC 5912 was in the previous version and is in the downref registry > already, so needn't concern us. > - RFC 2985 has been moved from Informative in -04 to Normative in -05. > Since RFC 2985 is a reproduction of a a external standard, I don't think > there should be any issue here, but the reference probably ought to be > normative, and should have been called out in the last call - apologies > for failing to point this out in my LC review. > -RFC 7107 is only used to flag the definition of the SMI Security for > S/MIME Attributes registry. I think this could safely be taken as > informative. > > Thus the only real issue is with RFC 2985. > > Nits/editorial comments: > Abstract: Must not have references s/[RFC2985]/(RFC 2985)/ > > s3: Currently s3.1 states in the text that the maximum length of the > DirectoryString is 255. ss3.2 and 3.3 have this defined in the ASN.1 > but not in the text. It would make things consistent if this was stated > in para 2 of s3: > s/defined as a DirectoryString/defined as a DirectoryString with maximum > length 255/ > > s4, last para: s/(see [RFC7030], s3.7 second paragraph)/(see Section 3.7 > of [RFC3070])/ >
- [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-wallac… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-wa… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-wa… Jari Arkko