[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt (full)
Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Sun, 24 June 2012 17:31 UTC
Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC4021F85D6 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qDdpZF2my3Pt for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7534221F85D4 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5OHV6if045766; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:31:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201206241731.q5OHV6if045766@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 19:31:06 +0200
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt (full)
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:31:08 -0000
(this message was stuck by the problems of the art.tools.ietf.org box but without too much trouble as the summary went through in time) I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20120606 IETF LC End Date: 20120612 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - ToC Page 2: RA Guard -> RA-Guard - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 1 page 3: a funny fact is DHCPv4 (which IMHO is not really over IP) is not sensible to this attack, at the opposite of DHCPv6... - 2 page 4, title: RA Guard -> RA-Guard - 3 page 9, point 6: in fact IPsec has its own issue with fragmentation... Nevertheless I agree with the proposed text. - 6 page 13: i.e. -> i.e., and e.g. -> e.g., - 7 page 14: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - B page 18: organisations -> organizations Thanks Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
- [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-imp… Francis Dupont