Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt
"Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com> Mon, 10 March 2008 15:54 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D144228C5BB; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZhtmfJXaySF; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FAA28C69B; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E64328C41A for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pqWf5Ari4pJR for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp109.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp109.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ACFF28D974 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 75345 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 15:05:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Wylie) (turners@ieca.com@130.129.18.223 with login) by smtp109.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 15:05:57 -0000
X-YMail-OSG: ewDYfbAVM1lHAF_2tMzfEdFNZsDMdWYSGrXlkaYBJqhxXOdUEozdy6A0w8LH19Ftdxp.6zgqRg--
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: "Turner, Sean P." <turners@ieca.com>
To: 'Elwyn Davies' <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, 'General Area Review Team' <gen-art@ietf.org>
References: <47D18547.4050905@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:58:16 -0400
Organization: IECA, Inc.
Message-ID: <005501c882bf$2ca8bf00$df128182@Wylie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: AciAfrkdeq24XAdrRDGrLe6YnKAauACPPCfQ
In-Reply-To: <47D18547.4050905@dial.pipex.com>
Cc: 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>, jimsch@exmsft.com, smime-chairs@tools.ietf.org, smime-ads@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Elwyn, Thanks for the review. Responses inline... spt >-----Original Message----- >Comments: >s3: The first part of the specification for MultipleSignatures is : > >> The fields in MultipleSignatures have the following meaning: >> >> - bodyHashAlg includes the digest algorithmIdentifier for the >> referenced multiple-signatures attribute. >> >> - signAlg includes the signature algorithmIdentifier for the >> referenced multiple-signatures attribute. >> >I am confused by the use of 'includes' here: Do these specs >imply that the values of these fields are comma separated >lists of all relevant alg identifiers for the signatures? An >example with three signatures might clarify what is going on, >but the spec should be clarified in any case, I think (but I >may just not be sufficiently knowledgable about this sort of spec). The attribute is multivalued (discussed before the ASN.1) so there is a set of values for each signature applied. The reason for only using two in the example was purely based on page real estate. >Editorial: >idnits reports a clean bill of health. > >Abstract: Expand CMS acronym. fixed >s5: s/in a singled/in a single/ fixed >s5.2: s/the rquire application/the required application/ fixed >s5.3, para 5: The first sentence >> >> If signatures are added for the support of [ESS] features, then the >> fact that an outer layer signature can be treated as a non- >> significant failure. >> >does not parse. Probably missing 'is invalid' or some such >relating to outer layer signature. fixed >Appendix B: 'hashes CMS'??? Does not parse! fixed (reword) >B.1: s/is needed/are needed/ fixed (reword) >B.2 1/a/ii: s/Reistance/Resistance/ fixed >B.2 1/c/iii: s/success/successful/ fixed >B.2 2: Expand DER acronym. fixed >B.2: is not normative but uses SHOULD NOT. fixed >B.2 (2nd para on p18): s/that the attack/than the attack/ fixed _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-mult… Elwyn Davies
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-smime-… Turner, Sean P.