IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-08

Venkatesan Mahalingam <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com> Wed, 02 September 2015 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843951B4722; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VV3TOOordJI; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E4B1B4B24; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj9 with SMTP id j9so14161777lag.2; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RLMrWqmvSoeDpNCA+O0Wmgq2eC+35Xs0UiKksuxDO+c=; b=wnfe8PZKIZraDlMy+FxqkjwLz/k4Vux8MXU869MF63IOHndJvy2NSsxYw9q7vMAao7 zubgcfeo1658TAZmAFZpnmBIjjJxP69e2dWkZg4YOfX7sbYxbyxtkktP1w8g+S5C5xo4 iTJDsDtpLOsA2SAbELNiKOc/td2GmJ+tMag8Jk9x/hW07WGUQHEA4l/KCSNBlQ0wJrtY kSGQ3dXR95pMinU23k0wPM6CKu+Lr4DAeugEvvnM2R5Pnk5oX2yXCR/SE4fpENYwQZmh xp0DM3sqWeQtuVg+WW96fkRSsfua/ZQyYaW20k9gdDnMUcjnnn0BLkBIY9Be/dMkx8Rl xw6w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.52.2 with SMTP id p2mr17683365lbo.8.1441221081481; Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.84.147 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Sep 2015 12:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9D2F89DE-207F-4AF7-AC79-0F1F29D89B06@piuha.net>
References: <D20611A3.12E21%peter@akayla.com> <9D2F89DE-207F-4AF7-AC79-0F1F29D89B06@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 12:11:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+UNA025Mb7QmQrkFuXfcphN6O10OEWfe+8Dksr3Yjuv4DTJ4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Venkatesan Mahalingam <venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3bb3e9acdb6051ec86e88"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/E4GyUtctY8KxJg8Z6vqewF9RgZ8>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-id-mib-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 19:11:27 -0000

Hi Jari,

>> One remaining issue is that I think when you said "octet size 0” in the
>> draft your probably meant “octet string size 0” or something along those
>> lines. Perhaps that could be changed as well.

Yes, we meant octet string size 0, will change it in the next version.

-Venkat.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> Peter, thank you again for the review, and this one is indeed a detailed
> one! Based on -09 I think the authors have seen the review and have or
> are checking the draft to make changes if needed.
>
> One remaining issue is that I think when you said "octet size 0” in the
> draft your probably meant “octet string size 0” or something along those
> lines. Perhaps that could be changed as well.
>
> FYI: The draft is on tomorrow’s IESG telechat, and I have balloted
> no-objection.
>
> Jari
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email