Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16

Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com> Mon, 04 February 2019 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C516712870E for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com header.b=edwcL1Yn; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com header.b=B0VcgUqV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oduQYjUJTxqz for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EEF6127598 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:48:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1549320527; x=1551912527; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=M1R4aDHuaFPFAbPTo/ZjCwZuYOJxetO6e4lVRIHd6WA=; b=edwcL1YnN4BFdNspD8OSFNGUrhNkOruMxakfpyxUfU4YS0yS4koFhzKYR6rgtTz/ 1F7DGnUhhy7lI/lwNMM80JJKexykHHaYSKjB+wVOsJnmOrqVeDyQfW/Vh21LOXC8 FFyctZZfZ6Vw0Qh5bqkocAz0fxkdeIYlmhpd6HG1iCc=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-da1ff70000005ff7-85-5c58c14f952b
Received: from ESESSMB505.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.123]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 5C.09.24567.F41C85C5; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:48:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.166) by ESESSMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:48:46 +0100
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (153.88.183.157) by ESESSMB505.ericsson.se (153.88.183.166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 23:48:46 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericsson.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=M1R4aDHuaFPFAbPTo/ZjCwZuYOJxetO6e4lVRIHd6WA=; b=B0VcgUqVaJBAOR4ctEqbK7YsnHEYen+vRIAJ+56OkV2Q8X1oO8Mg8SwGlhiii+V1MnS32PF4TaEJL29pmDVoTmvQKvFJlskWPlOqfkKhmMWr04w19Sv/UQX+Apu1GR8nEMumXUw2VfFrULLdSv9y55VCih1+UAnr3PITNXAgfTc=
Received: from BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.140.76) by BN8PR15MB2532.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (20.179.136.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.22; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:48:44 +0000
Received: from BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ced:3d45:4e9d:f653]) by BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1ced:3d45:4e9d:f653%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1580.019; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:48:44 +0000
From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
To: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>, "draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme.all@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16
Thread-Index: AdS6AXpmB06Lq5qJQ9mEFCKG02iH2gCSO5ngACRUQyA=
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:48:44 +0000
Message-ID: <BN8PR15MB2802F63981CA6706AD2A92649A6D0@BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN8PR15MB2802BD6D363951E396F0961F9A920@BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <0a8ee63d79c94929b6964df1b3c15e1b@NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <0a8ee63d79c94929b6964df1b3c15e1b@NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com;
x-originating-ip: [129.192.183.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN8PR15MB2532; 6:Ec8Re/bNyC4WagCJA80H/KkpUCf3jZhQFYfnCj5Wf/sRq+8WlVUfPWW5dIjCFd8LAPVX7FFalulMUBzw7YhDjJH1Ai2kazoQylq8J0JofioR0NY7olfuY9KvSLSgmjhTE4g5ASKoxG05b7efRGe0D8Kqeeq1TZ2Q8LQVKCLaoM7zTurbKSkDKd6HNxLymn/JtdRfnylUjh7necWLN3XLmxXymtgAN/JZk8zq7jgHQi3Y3V4s1rwbuygKWfgUaJrV0bHfB7LFkBAaWx0drrG9wJUHkH26Pz1zUlFVWkxmGrss8Vt4bo9CGrZ4/8H+iWfxoqfR/d8PhlQ6QfJozNoiJmCDnodsafVljNRWPKP1WofxnmI4AYdne43D+/h9zo406Xb9dvTxeofEhrfbkuOg2cSsuqvFJinNyan90LWCAOqetwlySwaR9IEfB5zQUbV0w+Rnvon+q3K5NxIHsznkEA==; 5:2DEH/CP2Q36xX7shhdjmNyWdodANY+OwVNKnUeXFCWhzoUIaTOQUWzRtMCyHcVy9whKI7bYq93tgBa97iI0qXNU+kGeSjbyPD2qP8WSg/yU8mtoHEt1tIWE/xWRKuJPbB16+VDuO9pigBLb1FhFl2BxutryH4MVL6OVNejGM4wYBxXBOVUOD+naRFSWelTv/QNy+pfMObRjjYYFpgmVpVw==; 7:1ZQE2jUHJ3+kmozlrgUa5U3doJHtWrTZxBmku1XzLxd12D6MUZcqq0mYHd4nF49C50AVka+5iisosf4ccikn6yEcHe6eD7/rjqx1T0R14iIsiUuViRJiLPLR5TUHEaLbKjQHce6aF4GUuWqMZj37FQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: da6c1f9b-3733-409d-8023-08d68af2eae6
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN8PR15MB2532;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR15MB2532:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR15MB25321959DD844B7E490079D09A6D0@BN8PR15MB2532.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0938781D02
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(39860400002)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(199004)(189003)(478600001)(11346002)(102836004)(186003)(53936002)(9686003)(106356001)(110136005)(105586002)(68736007)(236005)(256004)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(54896002)(6436002)(55016002)(26005)(6306002)(6506007)(486006)(2501003)(9326002)(44832011)(446003)(476003)(790700001)(8936002)(74316002)(3846002)(2201001)(7696005)(97736004)(25786009)(76176011)(53546011)(66066001)(316002)(229853002)(33656002)(606006)(7736002)(99286004)(2906002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(14454004)(6116002)(86362001)(53386004)(6246003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR15MB2532; H:BN8PR15MB2802.namprd15.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: ericsson.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: xrCfDGCIXS/mKjTAh6dHoPyYDRb/Tj5qr5OQQenXGCOg0zWfiGGYvsMCsRFSVuQUIRywYnLBnMFX9vQudTJGs+b8zKU8ieOjgGEzB87yRqBZTYPI76kWtqzdt/Qm+knrfwKI0td2/d0mi9uVDhrrv4PzcL1hhR/GvL/X4AC+H2uTnD6lC9RLXTrNzr8RVgcQiyYyxQkpLQE200F0YQJ7B9Fgx3rmGeGljhVKW9T651ren4g3FF60Lhube1i2D2cmCxjhRbwzipJ6d73+5nYw1mVhk0SQ/h5/lSPVMLylE27N6Oh940xgLixbWqDG9zyBnOtilvk/c8VXjdP+g0bqexKsDiaiI4W+nyxRG6QYpMtE0pptJzGkPUdAUcFtfnR4jIPmFbKg42FuwJnxpYOMG3kYAIHJdx/Ej0p3loFPEts=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN8PR15MB2802F63981CA6706AD2A92649A6D0BN8PR15MB2802namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: da6c1f9b-3733-409d-8023-08d68af2eae6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Feb 2019 22:48:44.5646 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 92e84ceb-fbfd-47ab-be52-080c6b87953f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR15MB2532
X-OriginatorOrg: ericsson.com
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA02Sa0hTYRjHeXfOmcfl5HVpPln2YWSkpl3MHBqSX0IKsQ+GlpKudtDpnLJj kgUxCikvUykmqIWXREO74DIMb+TykilYmoWJONNmXtZlmilb0rYzwW+/5///P8/7Pi8vTYh0 lA8tV+YwKqVUIeYLyIqEthtBsT0JSUdM01gyP67hS8YXV0jJz/UJdIqIrq/f4EXXaY3oHO+i 4KSMUchzGdXhyBRBWv7kNzJbr7pWPtaM1OierBC50oCPw4hpFRUiAS3CvQgK6qYorviD4I2u n+SKRzxYerzkiJG4jIAxq9rZc58H6hdWgitmEHwwDxH2yXwsgTbLvGOYJx5E0NFS6TB24jho qCwg7eyJz8OKQU1xHA4m/ScXO5N4PxSXDvHtLMRJoKl5xudOeIhA+9LgaHDFZ2FxYBTZGeFd 8PfdE56dCewNX+aqedx+GOo7RwiOvWBhdpPi8lIosnaSnC4G01qTk31htLrIsRvgWy7Q17Lh HBQD3b/r+JwxgcCg+e40AuCj+rOtm7ZxBhTfEXHyXtDf7SW4vJmCrn9mR16EGWh8mo+40D5o 0syQZSiwctvFOc6C0gEjVel4AQ8YrJgjOf0Q1HSY+RwHQkPtErHFw69nedv1GuTShLxYhr2c mXosJJhRya+wbJYyWMnk6JDtJ/W0WvxeobHlKD3CNBK7CZNbE5JElDSXzcvUI6AJsaew/4xN EsqkedcZVVay6qqCYfVoD02KvYVWkUeSCKdKc5gMhslmVFsuj3b1UaN4g9t8eujNyOX2RAtb cuBXRF37wb8XgoYT31IpYYGN5cEdOwZDAlYe6BEdmxtyybfAr6SwWXs7oSvVzz90OIaU7S6O ohem0/sjqthu7FVByo2KbBfr8z5DqbFWV+W+ftrSttnpPxkfql0LW+3xcKeq535Y3i/GCWeG wqe+nhCTbJr0aAChYqX/AQwxwLNFAwAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/EUy05v4DTNm_cgNju8gYCviBuwE>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:48:54 -0000

Hi,
  Thank you yes, this is a lot clearer.

Best,
Meral



From: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>;
Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2019 9:34 PM
To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>;; draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme.all@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16

>-Section 8, "an application should avoid sending/receiving FEC repair streams if it knows that sending/receiving those FEC repair streams would not help at all in recovering the missing packets. It is RECOMMENDED that the amount and type (row, column, or both) of FEC protection is adjusted dynamically based on the packet loss rate and burst loss length observed by the applications."

>How would the application know that sending/receiving those FEC repair streams would not help at all? any rule of thumb to add here?

The editors propose that the above text be revised as follows:


"... an application should avoid sending/receiving FEC repair streams if it knows that sending/receiving those FEC repair streams would not help at all in recovering the missing packets.  Examples of where FEC would not be beneficial are:  (1) if the successful recovery rate as determined by RTCP feedback is low (see RFC 5725),  and (2) the application has a smaller latency requirement than the repair window adopted by the FEC configuration based on the expected burst loss duration and the target FEC overhead.  It is RECOMMENDED that the amount and type (row, column, or both) of FEC protection is adjusted  dynamically based on the packet loss rate and burst loss length observed by the applications."

Please let us know if this is acceptable.

Thanks,

-Giri Mandyam

From: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com<mailto:meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 11:50 PM
To: draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme.all@ietf.org>; gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>;.

Document: draft-ietf-payload-flexible-fec-scheme-16

Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2019-01-31
IETF LC End Date: 2019-02-01
IESG Telechat date: NA


Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC .
Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
-Section 1.1.1 Title "One-Dimensionsal "--->"One-Dimensional"

-[Page 14] 3.2.  , "signficant"--->"significant"

-[Page 16], 4.2.1.  , "pakcets"--->"packets"

-[Page 35], 6.3.1.  , "reciever"--->"receiver"

-[Page 35], 6.3.1.1.  , "signficant"--->"significant"

-[Page 43], 7., "several Sesssion "--->"several Session "

-Section 8, "an application should avoid
   sending/receiving FEC repair streams if it knows that sending/
   receiving those FEC repair streams would not help at all in
   recovering the missing packets. It is RECOMMENDED that the amount
   and type (row, column, or both) of FEC protection is adjusted
   dynamically based on the packet loss rate and burst loss length
   observed by the applications."

How would the application know that sending/receiving those FEC repair streams would not help at all? any rule of thumb to add here?


Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com>