[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-17
"McCann Peter-A001034" <pete.mccann@motorola.com> Mon, 19 April 2010 03:01 UTC
Return-Path: <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD173A6A6C for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UcSk3FOPjNsU for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail55.messagelabs.com (mail55.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A553A6A68 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: pete.mccann@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-55.messagelabs.com!1271646067!105786670!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 11962 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2010 03:01:08 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-10.tower-55.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Apr 2010 03:01:08 -0000
Received: from il06exr03.mot.com (il06exr03.mot.com [129.188.137.133]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3J312wJ001614 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:01:07 -0700 (MST)
Received: from il06vts04.mot.com (il06vts04.mot.com [129.188.137.144]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/Vontu) with SMTP id o3J3121n013864 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:01:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from de01exm70.ds.mot.com (de01exm70.am.mot.com [10.176.8.26]) by il06exr03.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id o3J311er013861 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:01:01 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:00:40 -0400
Message-ID: <274D46DDEB9F2244B2F1EA66B3FF54BC0689020E@de01exm70.ds.mot.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-17
Thread-Index: AcrfbH5lXFWNP+KETBiZYi9dlt5/oQ==
From: McCann Peter-A001034 <pete.mccann@motorola.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework.all@tools.ietf.org
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-17
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:01:27 -0000
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-17 Reviewer: Pete McCann Review Date: 18 April 2010 IESG Telechat date: 22 April 2010 Summary: Misgivings remain. Major issues: All of the minor issues and nits that I raised in the LC review have been addressed. Thanks for that. I still have misgivings about supporting an architecture where the local network can override a user's policy about bandwidth and codecs to use during calls. This seems to promote a non-neutral network where the local network operator inserts himself into the service application logic. The fact that the format of the profiles isn't specified anywhere makes me wonder about interoperability and whether some users will be locked into a single provider. Minor issues: none Nits/editorial comments: none
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-s… McCann Peter-A001034