Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cose-x509-07

Thank you for your reviews! I will verify that those nits are fixed in the
next version of the draft.

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 3:39 AM Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

> Vijay, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
>
> Alissa
>
>
> > On Sep 18, 2020, at 10:35 AM, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
> > Review result: Ready with Nits
> >
> > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> > like any other last call comments.
> >
> > For more information, please see the FAQ at
> >
> > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-cose-x509-07
> > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
> > Review Date: 2020-09-18
> > IETF LC End Date: 2020-10-01
> > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> >
> > Summary: Ready for publication with nits.
> >
> > Major issues: 0
> >
> > Minor issues: 0
> >
> > Nits/editorial comments: 5
> >
> > (Sn refers to Section n)
> > - S1: s/ad decided/and decided/
> > - S1: s/Since that time a/Since that time, a/
> > - S1: s/in the 6TiSCH environment [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap],
> > describes/in the 6TiSCH environment, [I-D.richardson-enrollment-roadmap]
> > describes/ - S1: "A third scenario..." The wording seemed odd since
> there is no
> > text that sets the expectation that there will be three scenarios for
> > discussion.  If your intent is to enumerate the different scenarios,
> probably
> > best to prepare the reader for this ahead of time. - S2: s/which it can
> then
> > provide to/that it subsequently provides to/
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gen-art mailing list
> > Gen-art@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
>
>