[Gen-art] Late Last Call + Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10
Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com> Thu, 11 December 2008 13:24 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946BC3A6A07; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:24:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51113A67CC for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:24:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MwhTmCjvlaDr for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B114F3A6A07 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 05:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 9451B22869 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:24:14 +0100 (CET)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-acf82bb00000537b-d4-4941147ebcf7
Received: from esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.123]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 5C26F227CF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:24:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.172]) by esealmw126.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:21:55 +0100
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw128.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:20:23 +0100
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AD423F6 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:20:23 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBFF4DAAA for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:20:23 +0200 (EET)
Resent-To: Gen-ART Mailing List <gen-art@ietf.org>
From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Resent-From: Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
Message-Id: <F76BA305-C2EB-438D-BF0C-040689F1B732@ericsson.com>
Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:20:23 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 15:15:30 +0200
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
Resent-Message-Id: <20081211132023.6CBFF4DAAA@nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2008 13:20:23.0851 (UTC) FILETIME=[396C9FB0:01C95B93]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: Gen-ART Mailing List <gen-art@ietf.org>, robert.thurlow@sun.com, nfsv4-ads@tools.ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Gen-art] Late Last Call + Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document..........: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10 Reviewer..........: Christian Vogt Review date.......: December 11, 2008 IESG Telechat date: December 11, 2008 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Document draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1831bis-10 is an update of the "Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2", RFC 1831. It seeks to promote the RPC protocol to draft standard. The document is overall in good quality. However, one aspect where I found the document to be insufficient is in the specification of security methods. The documents does list possible security methods, but it neither specifies them, nor does it state a mandatory-to-support method other than null-authentication. I am aware that the predecessor document, RFC 1831 also did not attend to security methods any more carefully. But the security-related requirements for IETF documents have become stricter since the publication of the predecessor document in 1995, which implies that this document would need to pay more attention to security-related aspects. Suggestion: Could the list of possible security methods (alias "security flavors") be limited to those for which there are clear protocol specifications? E.g., one of the possible methods, AUTH_DH, currently refers to an academic publication rather than a protocol specification. That's insufficient. And could one of the non-null security methods be made mandatory? - Christian _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Late Last Call + Gen-ART review of draf… Christian Vogt
- Re: [Gen-art] Late Last Call + Gen-ART review of … Robert Thurlow