[Gen-art] Re: Gen-ART review of IETF LC draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem-07.txt

Miguel Garcia wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
> http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-6lowpan-problem-07.txt
> Reviewer: Miguel Garcia <miguel.an.garcia@nokia.com>
> Review Date:  2007-02-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2007-03-01
> IESG Telechat date: (if known)
>
> Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an informational RFC.
>
> Comments:
>
> A couple of minor comments:
>
> 1) The draft indicates in its 3rd line that the intended status is 
> "Standards Track". However, the I-D tracker is listing it as 
> Informational. The draft itself seems to be merely informational, due 
> to the lack of normative statements.
Yes, it should be Informational. The proper status is in the tracker, so 
I think we can leave it up to the RFC Editor here. I'll include a note 
for them if the document doesn't end up being revised for some other reason.
>
> 2) Since the draft does not contain any normative statement 
> (capitalized MUST, MAY, SHOULD, etc.), I am not sure if Section 1.1 
> and the reference to RFC 2119 makes sense. It could be safely deleted.
Agreed.
>
> 3) The split between normative and informative references is a bit 
> subjective. In my opinion, the only normative references here should 
> be [ieee802.15.4] and [RFC2460], I think the others are informative in 
> nature.
>
> Other than these nits, the draft looks good.
Thanks for the review. I'll capture these as Editor's notes for now.

- Mark
>
> /Miguel
>
>
> _________

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art