Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 17 December 2012 03:25 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC2C21F8554; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:25:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.366, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4q7yZIEu835E; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1924521F89AC; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.33.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40484509B5; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:25:43 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <023301cddb5f$73eb02d0$5bc10870$@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:25:40 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CA1BECA0-5084-4833-8EA8-EC507C7913E8@mnot.net>
References: <023301cddb5f$73eb02d0$5bc10870$@gmail.com>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch.all@tools.ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 03:25:48 -0000
Both fixed in SVN; thanks for the review. On 16/12/2012, at 6:32 PM, Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. > > > Document: draft-ietf-appsawg-json-patch-08 > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date:2012–12–16 > IETF LC End Date: 2012–12–25 > IESG Telechat date: 2013-1-10 > > Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication. > > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > 1. The document has as the intended status “Informational” while the last call says that the intended status is proposed standard? > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > • In the IANA section the “Encoding considerations: binary”. I noticed that RFC 4627 has a broader description: > “Encoding considerations: 8bit if UTF-8; binary if UTF-16 or UTF-32 > JSON may be represented using UTF-8, UTF-16, or UTF-32. When JSON is written in UTF-8, JSON is 8bit compatible. When JSON is written in UTF-16 or UTF-32, the binary content-transfer-encoding must be used.” > > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-appsawg… Roni Even
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-app… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-app… Paul C. Bryan
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-app… Mark Nottingham