[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Mon, 23 September 2013 20:29 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A7B21F9D38; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_LIST=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2BTnspHhp4N8; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AB521F9D30; Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.7] (mobile-166-147-070-153.mycingular.net [166.147.70.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r8NKTHL5050214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:29:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:29:16 -0500
Message-Id: <5D62D2D2-26DD-4BC4-A296-0C4AB414F549@nostrum.com>
To: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop.all@tools.ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 166.147.70.153 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org list" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:29:19 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-interop-05 Reviewer: Ben Campbell Review Date: 2013-09-23 IETF LC End Date: 2013-09-24 Summary: Ready for publication as an informational RFC. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: -- Abstract: Please expand H-VPLS on first mention -- section 1, 1st paragraph: Please expand VPLS on first mention. -- section 4, 3rd to last paragraph: "Different PBB access networks..." The previous and subsequent paragraphs say "PBBN access networks". Should this instance also say PBBN? -- section 4.3: 2nd paragraph says this scenario is applicable to "Loosely Coupled Service Domains" and "Different Service Domains". The 4th paragraph mentions "Tightly...". Does that mean the scenario also applies to "Tightly Coupled Service Domains"? (i.e. should it be added to the 2nd paragraph, or removed from the 4th?)
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-p… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2v… Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2v… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-l2v… Jari Arkko