IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt

Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> Wed, 04 June 2008 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FD83A67FA; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001063A694B for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lw39Cj7Zuo+b for <gen-art@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCA83A690B for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.96) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:34 -0700
Received: from TK5-EXMLT-W605V.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.18.79) by tk5-exhub-c103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.96) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:27 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([fe80::8de9:51a2:cd62:f122]) by TK5-EXMLT-W605V.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.79]) with mapi; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:20:17 -0700
From: Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc@tools.ietf.org" <draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:20:23 -0700
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt
Thread-Index: AcjGh52GKdKqSsmJSsee5yGYKS/ZdAACRyuQ
Message-ID: <AB1E5627D2489D45BD01B84BD5B9004606180F65DD@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <484704EF.3040903@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <484704EF.3040903@ericsson.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Tim Polk <wpolk@nist.gov>, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

No. There is no dependency on the older revision. The reference should be updated.

Tim, can you add a note to the RFC editor to replace RFC3280 with RFC5280? Thanks,

--larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:11 PM
To: General Area Review Team; draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc@tools.ietf.org
Cc: Tim Polk; Jeffrey Hutzelman
Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for
draft-zhu-pkinit-ecc-04.txt

For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as informational RFC but I
have a question.

Minor
=====

* The draft refers to RFC3280 that has been updated by RFC5280. Is there
anything in the draft that is dependent on the "old" profile or can it
refer to the new one instead?

Cheers
Suresh








_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email