[Gen-art] Gen-ART re-review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Fri, 14 September 2007 13:33 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWBIm-0000YL-Hi; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:44 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IWBIk-0000Xi-QJ for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:42 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWBIk-0000XV-Et for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:42 -0400
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172] helo=mgw-ext13.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWBIj-0006mk-RT for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:42 -0400
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext13.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id l8EDXS3E018376; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:33:38 +0300
Received: from esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.34]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:33:27 +0300
Received: from esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.53]) by esebh104.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:33:28 +0300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:33:27 +0300
Message-ID: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F2404966CBD@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART re-review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
Thread-Index: Acein+7BuIHU+hxvT9iEZtZl28dSWBUMxTSQ
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org, ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org, jpv@cisco.com, jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Sep 2007 13:33:28.0339 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5797E30:01C7F6D3]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART re-review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Updating my Gen-ART Last Call review: My comment #2 is addressed by the RFC Editor note currently in the tracker; and comment #3 has been taken care of as well. Comment #1 could be addressed by RFC Editor note, too, as suggested by the authors (email from Jean-Louis Le Roux on May 30th): > So we will remove the sentence "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a > new code point registry for sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS > CAPABILITY TLV" and replace by "IANA has defined a registry > for sub-TLVs of the IS-IS CAPABILITY TLV" Best regards, Pasi > -----Original Message----- > From: Eronen Pasi (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) > Sent: 30 May, 2007 12:50 > To: 'gen-art@ietf.org'; 'ccamp-chairs@tools.ietf.org'; > 'ccamp-ads@tools.ietf.org'; 'jpv@cisco.com'; > 'jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com' > Subject: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 > > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call > comments you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-te-node-cap-05 > Reviewer: Pasi Eronen > Review Date: 30 May 2007 > IETF LC End Date: 06 June 2007 > IESG Telechat date: (not known yet) > > Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits > that should be fixed before publication. > > Comments: > > 1) Section 8.2 "[IS-IS-CAP] defines a new code point registry for > sub-TLVs carried in the ISIS CAPABILITY TLV". The current version of > [IS-IS-CAP] does not seem to define any new IANA-maintained > registries. This may be an bug in [IS-IS-CAP]? > > 2) Section 8.3: the bit numbers in this section don't match the bit > numbers in Sections 4.1/4.2. > > 3) As noted in the proto write-up, there's a normative downref (RFC > 3784). This downref was not called out in the IETF last call message, > and it's not listed in the downref registry. > > Best regards, > Pasi > _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art