Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC Review of draft-ietf-avt-forward-shifted-red-05

[Qiaobing Xie <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Wassim,

Thanks for the comments. I will remove the reference in the Abstract as 
you suggested. But the sentence in Section 3 that you suggested to 
re-write is actually a direct quote from RFC 2198.

-Q

Wassim Haddad wrote:
> I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
> reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq
> 
> Please resolve these comments along with any other comments you may receive.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-avt-forward-shifted-red-05
> Reviewer: Wassim Haddad
> Review Date: 13-July-2010
> IETF LC End Date: 09-July-2010
> IESG Telechat date: 15-July-2010
> 
> Summary: The document is ready for publication as a a proposed standard.
> 
> Major issues: none
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> - The Abstract points to one reference and it would be better to remove it.
> 
> - Section 3: I would suggest re-writing the last three lines to make the sentence easier to understand: 
> "and is hence a time..." should be re-written.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Wassim H.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>