[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt

Black_David@emc.com Sat, 03 June 2006 03:04 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRb-0003vE-De; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRa-0003v9-1u for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:54 -0400
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRY-0007Tq-PI for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:54 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k5334nLR019277; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MAHO3MSX2.corp.emc.com (maho3msx2.corp.emc.com [128.221.11.32]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k5334jqe019084; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by maho3msx2.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <JF8BBRF4>; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:41 -0400
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B66D66@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
From: Black_David@emc.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.6.2.193508
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P2 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_CRUFT 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Cc: Black_David@emc.com
Subject: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt.

For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other
Last Call comments you may receive.

This draft is on the right track but has open issues,
described in the review.

This reviewer concurs with the rationale in Section 5
of the draft, and agrees that something like IONs are needed.

One should normally give RFC 3933 process experiments a
fair degree of latitude, but this draft is a significant
stretch of what was envisioned in RFC 3933, even if the
general idea and intent are good.  The sheer breadth of
what the ION experiment would allow is impressive:
- The list of ION approvers and the scope of what they
	can approve is unlimited.
- The process by which an ION is approved is unspecified
	- the draft just says that approval is required.  For
	example, there is no discussion of Last Call of any
	form, even for significant process changes.
- The format of IONs is unspecified.
All of the above would doubtless be addressed by IONs, but
that circular dependency is a serious stretch of RFC 3933's
expectation that the IESG approves specific process 
change experiments - approval of this draft would provide
a framework for arbitrary IETF entities to run arbitrary
process experiments.  At least the above three aspects of
IONs should be much more tightly specified.

IONs and ION drafts intend to move from a version numbering
scheme to a date-based versioning scheme.  Particularly for
Draft IONs, this will come as a surprise to the community.
Using a version number in addition to dates would be a
very good idea for Draft and Approved IONs.

The draft name is clever ;-).

Thanks,
--David
----------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Technologist
EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (508) 293-7953             FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786
black_david@emc.com        Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
----------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art