[Gen-art] GenART review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
Black_David@emc.com Sat, 03 June 2006 03:04 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRb-0003vE-De; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:55 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRa-0003v9-1u for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:54 -0400
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com ([128.222.32.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FmMRY-0007Tq-PI for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:54 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (uraeus.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.14]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.7/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k5334nLR019277; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MAHO3MSX2.corp.emc.com (maho3msx2.corp.emc.com [128.221.11.32]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k5334jqe019084; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by maho3msx2.corp.emc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <JF8BBRF4>; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 23:04:41 -0400
Message-ID: <F222151D3323874393F83102D614E05502B66D66@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
From: Black_David@emc.com
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 23:04:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.3.0.1, Antispam-Data: 2006.6.2.193508
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=, SPAM=0%, Reason='EMC_BODY_1+ -3, EMC_FROM_0+ -2, NO_REAL_NAME 0, __C230066_P2 0, __C230066_P5 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MUA 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_CRUFT 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Cc: Black_David@emc.com
Subject: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-alvestrand-ipod-01.txt. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review. This reviewer concurs with the rationale in Section 5 of the draft, and agrees that something like IONs are needed. One should normally give RFC 3933 process experiments a fair degree of latitude, but this draft is a significant stretch of what was envisioned in RFC 3933, even if the general idea and intent are good. The sheer breadth of what the ION experiment would allow is impressive: - The list of ION approvers and the scope of what they can approve is unlimited. - The process by which an ION is approved is unspecified - the draft just says that approval is required. For example, there is no discussion of Last Call of any form, even for significant process changes. - The format of IONs is unspecified. All of the above would doubtless be addressed by IONs, but that circular dependency is a serious stretch of RFC 3933's expectation that the IESG approves specific process change experiments - approval of this draft would provide a framework for arbitrary IETF entities to run arbitrary process experiments. At least the above three aspects of IONs should be much more tightly specified. IONs and ION drafts intend to move from a version numbering scheme to a date-based versioning scheme. Particularly for Draft IONs, this will come as a surprise to the community. Using a version number in addition to dates would be a very good idea for Draft and Approved IONs. The draft name is clever ;-). Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Senior Technologist EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-alvestrand-ipod-… Black_David
- [Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-alvestrand-i… Harald Alvestrand
- [Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-alvestrand-i… Brian E Carpenter
- [Gen-art] Re: GenART review of draft-alvestrand-i… Harald Alvestrand