IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Thu, 06 August 2015 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB841A87C0; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44TneOrbkqnf; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEAFF1B317B; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267491233AA; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:19:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.240.40]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F245F0492; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:55:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90%25]) with mapi; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:55:08 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:55:07 -0400
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03
Thread-Index: AdDNuQ2sMuTykUJnQBiGXThcJ1NT4gCtOF/w
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D099E08ACC1@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <55BB2779.3070309@gmail.com> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D099E08A7DE@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <55BF0FC6.6040800@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55BF0FC6.6040800@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/P7o1DTIOps3WAT-kfBjum7bboOY>
Cc: "Fred Baker (fred) (fred@cisco.com)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:55:14 -0000

Hi Brian,
CC: Fred Baker,
see below...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 2:53 AM
> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis.all@ietf.org;
> General Area Review Team
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ippm-2679-bis-03
> 
> Hi Al,
> 
> On 03/08/2015 06:45, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> 
> <big snip>
> 
> > If we seek to identify several more distinctions for "packets of
> > Type-P", then I would prefer to update the RFC 2330 Framework Section
> > 13 on this topic, so it's more widely applicable and less IPv4-centric.
> > I'll take immediate steps to accomplish this update.
> 
> Yes, I think that is much more constructive than trying to do it
> piecemeal in the 2679bis draft. Perhaps you can contrive to plant a
> "forward reference" to 2330bis here, by saying that future extensions of
> the "packets of Type-P" definition will apply. That would take care of
> all my issues in one go.
> 
>    Brian

[ACM] 
Besides planting the forward reference,
I assembled a knowledgeable author team and we produced
a first draft update to RFC 2330 in the areas of Type-P and
standard-formed packets. Thanks for your early suggestions 
on the text.  

Also, thanks to Fred Baker who helped us 
understand some of the IPv6 complexities.

The 00 text is here:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-ippm-2330-stdform-typep-00

Comments welcome,
Al
(for the co-authors)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email