Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-harkins-owe-05

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 01 February 2017 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E4A12959A; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:31:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EAS6v89nlLjX; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78475129577; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 15:31:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C984D2D299; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 01:31:46 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6sirF2p2jjvv; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 01:31:46 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E315F2CC9B; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 01:31:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E2D46BB7-A390-4908-8218-8F0CF2C7D59E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <148130382551.4722.6409764037485645504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 00:31:47 +0100
Message-Id: <3C664EFF-801B-4954-961E-752C252A9ADE@piuha.net>
References: <148130382551.4722.6409764037485645504.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Lucy Yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/R18Fe7w6Wd1zQU-nLktFO5SYbdA>
Cc: gen-art-private@ietf.org, "General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, draft-harkins-owe.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-harkins-owe-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 23:31:49 -0000

Thanks for your review, Lucy!

Jari

On 09 Dec 2016, at 18:17, Lucy Yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> wrote:

> Reviewer: Lucy Yong
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> The draft is nearly ready for the publication.
> 
> Minor comment: Suggest adding this in security considerations: OWE
> provides encryption over the wireless medium, i.e., Wi-Fi without
> authentication. Thus it does not provide security for end-to-end
> traffic.  users should still use application level security such as
> VPN for end-to-end security. In this case, use of OWE prevents VPN
> authentication info. to be spoofed in open public Wi-Fi.
> one question: Will a user notices if OWE is used or not?  This may be
> important for some users.
> 
> nit: r/encryption of the wireless medium/encryption over the wireless
> medium/
> 
> 
>