IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de> Thu, 19 December 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC28B1AE025 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:08:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.789
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.789 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jpmnDxw05vVE for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from central.greenbytes.de (mail.greenbytes.de [217.91.35.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6501AE011 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:08:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unknown [217.91.35.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by central.greenbytes.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 601B810C130D; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:08:41 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52B31A05.2090503@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:08:37 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
References: <ABCAA4EF18F17B4FB619EA93DEF7939A32C879A2@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <14E1EFE9-60D4-46BB-A292-94C2932D6111@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <14E1EFE9-60D4-46BB-A292-94C2932D6111@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-25
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:08:46 -0000

On 2013-12-19 17:02, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Meral,
>
> Thank you for your review (once again!) Was there ever a response to the comments?
>
> Having reviewed the comments, I agree with the examples comment, but I don't think there's anything in the comments that would cause me to raise a Discuss. Editorial issues are largely up to the editors, and hopefully this feedback will be considered by them. But in general I do like to hear from someone that the comments have been considered.
>
> Jari
> ...

See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/525>.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email