[Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708C21A0072 for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:46:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wO0plltSuR8p for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:46:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com (co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.13.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7591A0457 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 04:46:29 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvcLAI0+C1OHCzIm/2dsb2JhbABZgkIjITtXqCoIj2GIWIEWFnSCJwEBAxIbTBIBFQcOViYBBA4NGodjAQyaWKsVF4xygUEgEYMrgRQEmWaFPos3gy2CKg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.97,534,1389762000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="50643263"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast-smtpauth.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.38]) by co300216-co-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 24 Feb 2014 07:46:28 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.58.12]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 24 Feb 2014 07:33:21 -0500
Received: from AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by AZ-FFEXHC02.global.avaya.com ([135.64.58.12]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:46:26 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02
Thread-Index: Ac8xXmwAmM7V+KZLRYuRAri+JMQFqw==
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:46:26 +0000
Message-ID: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA2E435527@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.64.58.45]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA2E435527AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/RaWBAd887p6OVvPvtAbLbidEUwI
Cc: "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:46:31 -0000

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at



<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-applicability-label-adv-02

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 2/24/14

IETF LC End Date: 2/24/14

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: ready with minor issues



Major issues:



Minor issues:



In the table in 2.2 - the RFC column points to RFC 5036 for the first two entries. Actually RFC 5036 defines only the range for LDP FEC types, but says nothing about the values. The right information seems to be 'xxxx (this RFC)' or '5036 and xxxx (this RFC)'



Nits/editorial comments:


Some acronyms are not expanded at first occurrence - FEC, LSR


Regards,

Dan