[Gen-art] genart review: draft-salowey-tls-rfc4507bis-00
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 21 August 2007 20:16 UTC
Return-path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INa8y-0003WE-4O; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:16:04 -0400
Received: from gen-art by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1INa8x-0003W8-6y for gen-art-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:16:03 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INa8w-0003W0-T8 for gen-art@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:16:02 -0400
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com ([72.232.15.10] helo=nostrum.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INa8w-0002qu-Ga for gen-art@ietf.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:16:02 -0400
Received: from [172.17.1.65] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l7LKFw5C001549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:15:58 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <40677B9E-AA89-4C9B-B626-3012CC458B01@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
To: gen-art@ietf.org, jsalowey@cisco.com, hzhou@cisco.com, pasi.eronen@nokia.com, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:15:56 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] genart review: draft-salowey-tls-rfc4507bis-00
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-salowey-tls-rfc4507bis-00 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 21Aug07 IETF LC End Date: 22Aug07 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication as proposed standard. It has some minor nits to consider prior to publication. Comments: 1) The first paragraph of section 3 says: This specification defines a mechanism .... (implying one) Implementations ... are expected to support both mechanisms. (implying two) What are the two mechanisms? Could this introduction be phrased to make that more obvious? 2) The caption for figure 2 is misformatted (and contains TAB characters) 3) Should the references to 2246 at the bottom of page 5 and in Sections 5.6 point to 4346 instead? I also was curious about whether the cookie approach to detecting 4507 clients introduced any new points of vulnerability, but I'm not the person to do that analysis so I asked ekr. When you were putting this together, did you have any discussion about that? Apologies if it's just dead obvious there's no potential issue. RjS _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] genart review: draft-salowey-tls-rfc450… Robert Sparks