Re: [Gen-art] [urn] Review: draft-martin-urn-globus-02

Thanks, Joel.

Authors, any responses to this? I think we need to discuss this…

Jari

On 12 Feb 2016, at 00:26, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-martin-urn-globus-02
>    A URN Namespace for Globus
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 11-Feb-2016
> IETF LC End Date: 9-March-2016
> IESG Telechat date: 17-March-2016
> 
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as an informational RFC.
> 
> This reviewer assumes that the appropriate message has been or will be sent to urn-nid@apps.ietf.org.
> 
> Major issues:
>    As per the pointer in this document to RFC 3406 section 4.3, this document is required to have a Namespace Considerations section which "outlines the perceived need for a new namespace (i.e., where existing namespaces fall short of the proposer's requirements)."  While there is a section called Namespace Considerations, what it lists is the envisioned usages, not the reasons existing name spaces are insufficient.
> 
> Minor issues: N/A
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: N/A
> 
> _______________________________________________
> urn mailing list
> urn@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn

Re: [Gen-art] [urn] Review: draft-martin-urn-globus-02

Attachment: signature.asc