IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-06

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 07 December 2022 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75D3C1526E8; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:41:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aW9oXHLYLBl9; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71661C1526E9; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 03:41:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:4d1c:18e3:378c:fa95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4EA751D8DBE; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 13:41:35 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1670413295; bh=u0YByAT9kOTOAT/VHVc6rB/gzkRAYF5WvNjzeEYMJ8o=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=obzddRn8sQFlRxGEaKdj0bdftxM+HvjXXeVoWcSpqO3ZKOlTUjVhwIf2iJub+oDHH 2wFvMGRtgw+95imtQq+DqNfu2LHCoU6l3mgurwyXjnlNTSc2C5d9uneKSi+7vUK5nz lvjzzODMddzxaIc9CjeBXfI2ID7NdEMN5PQYX6so=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_206A4BCA-916F-42B4-861C-598CD5711589"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.200.110.1.12\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <3abe8edb-a4a1-06d9-7af3-028e3c58b52a@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 13:41:25 +0200
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis.all@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <7549D66D-3AD9-43FF-99A1-C91C195616CE@eggert.org>
References: <3abe8edb-a4a1-06d9-7af3-028e3c58b52a@alum.mit.edu>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-MailScanner-ID: 4EA751D8DBE.A74BB
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ScsnbjY62gBe6t607P6D8FcIknc>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-06
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:41:51 -0000

Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this document.

Lars


> On Oct 25, 2022, at 17:54, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-06
> Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
> Review Date: 2022-10-25
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-28
> IESG Telechat date: ?
> 
> Summary:
> 
> This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review.
> 
> Issues:
> 
> Major: 0
> Minor: 1
> Nits:  2
> 
> 1) MINOR: In Section 4.1 (Extension Format):
> 
> The following:
> 
> "CAs SHOULD use the one-way hash function that is associated with the certificate signature to compute the hash value, and CAs MAY include other hash values."
> 
> introduces the possibility that a client might not support *any* of the provided hash algorithms. This seems bad.
> 
> RFC3709 didn't have this problem because it required that an SHA-1 hash be included and supported.
> 
> This can be fixed by changing "CAs SHOULD" to "CAs MUST".
> 
> 2) NIT: From IdNits:
> 
> ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 1952
> 
> I think it would be ok to change the reference to Informative.
> 
> 3) NIT: Typos
> 
> In Section 3 (Logotype Data):
> 
> s/then each image objects/then each image object/
> 
> In Section 7 (Image Formats):
> 
> s/The following table lists many commons/The following table lists many common/
> 
> s/requirements these image formats/requirements for these image formats/
> 
> s/the client will receive response/the client will receive a response/
> 
> (The last one above appears twice.)
> 
> In Section 10 (Privacy Considerations):
> 
> s/cache logotype data is cached/cache logotype data/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email