[Gen-art] Late, short review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Fri, 28 October 2005 09:19 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVQOH-0005Yq-RS; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:19:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EVQOF-0005Ws-Ee for gen-art@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:19:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA03257 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:18:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVQbl-0007V7-Ig for gen-art@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:33:10 -0400
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27AB2596C2; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:18:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25225-10; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:18:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19E22596C6; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:17:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 05:43:33 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: gen-art@ietf.org, jon.peterson@neustar.biz
Message-ID: <70DEF6F3D8C9A497CB3BD45A@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.3 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1e48a527f609d1be2bc8d8a70eb76cb
Cc:
Subject: [Gen-art] Late, short review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2091269046=="
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc1832bis
Reviewer: Harald Alvestrand
Summary: Probably ready, one question.
This is not a proper review. I've only read it once.
Not even a proper CC list.
Big question: Should there be an IANA registry?
The text fits with an IANA registry with "standards action" needed.
An alternative would be "requires an updated version of this specification".
The current text seems to straddle these alternatives, and land on "no
registry, standards action required, but not necessarily on this text".
Note: there hasn't been a need for a new datatype (AFAIK) since 1832, so I
think "requires an updated version of this spec" is fine.
I have NOT reviewed the diffs from 1832, so I can't vouch for the truth of
the claim to non-changes. That's why the review didn't come before.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Late, short review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-… Harald Tveit Alvestrand