[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt
Black_David@emc.com Tue, 20 May 2008 05:43 UTC
Return-Path: <gen-art-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-gen-art-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A423A68BF; Mon, 19 May 2008 22:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C8A3A68BF; Mon, 19 May 2008 22:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MU-oQA5xj+OT; Mon, 19 May 2008 22:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BD03A698C; Mon, 19 May 2008 22:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m4K5gseG015199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 May 2008 01:42:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (nirah.lss.emc.com [10.254.144.13]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (Tablus Interceptor); Tue, 20 May 2008 01:31:44 -0400
Received: from corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com (corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com [10.254.64.53]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id m4K5gpaq012252; Tue, 20 May 2008 01:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Black_David@emc.com
Received: from CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com ([128.221.62.11]) by corpussmtp3.corp.emc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 20 May 2008 01:42:51 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 01:42:50 -0400
Message-ID: <8CC6CEAB44F131478D3A7B429ECACD91016F6253@CORPUSMX20A.corp.emc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt
Thread-Index: Aci6PFYBhnRQFOUWR5SnpaEDfR3ZtA==
To: M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk, floyd@icir.org, padhye@microsoft.com, widmer@acm.org, gen-art@ietf.org, dccp@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2008 05:42:51.0291 (UTC) FILETIME=[57BDA6B0:01C8BA3C]
Cc: tphelan@sonusnet.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, Black_David@emc.com, lars.eggert@nokia.com
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: gen-art-bounces@ietf.org
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt Reviewer: David L. Black Review Date: 19 May 2008 IESG Telechat date: 22 May 2008 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. This is a well-written detailed draft updating an existing RFC on rate-based congestion control. It has clearly had a high level of review by congestion control experts. I have only done a generalist review, and in particular have not checked the equations and pseudo-code in detail. I trust that the authors and reviewers in the DCCP WG to have done this level of review, as indicated by the change history. idnits 2.08.10 found 1 line that was 1 character too long and pointed out that a -04 version of the rfc2581bis draft exists. Neither of these need attention, as the RFC Editor will handle them in the normal course of editing activity. Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 black_david@emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ---------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-rfc34… Black_David
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-dccp-r… Sally Floyd