IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16

Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com> Tue, 17 September 2013 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <aallen@blackberry.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BBC11E849B for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.215
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.215 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kvU95xwfqNJs for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-p02.blackberry.com (smtp-p02.blackberry.com [208.65.78.89]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682CC11E84A1 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xct103ads.rim.net ([10.67.111.44]) by mhs215cnc.rim.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 17 Sep 2013 12:15:24 -0400
Received: from XMB104ADS.rim.net ([fe80::2494:a63d:e3:723b]) by XCT103ADS.rim.net ([fe80::c8f6:ae2e:c42b:3614%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:15:23 -0500
From: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn.all@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
Thread-Index: AQHOlCXyf4yss/k+a0+Wjrf+0H+nW5nKMgtA
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:15:23 +0000
Message-ID: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E18E6A@XMB104ADS.rim.net>
References: <52037931.5070602@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <52037931.5070602@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.67.110.253]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:40:43 -0700
Cc: "<gen-art@ietf.org> Team" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:15:33 -0000

Alexy

Thank you for the review.

My responses below prepended with [AA]

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melnikov@isode.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:56 AM
To: draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn.all@tools.ietf.org
Cc: <gen-art@ietf.org> Team
Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Document:  draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-16
Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov	
Review Date: 2013-08-08
IETF LC End Date: 2013-08-16

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational document (with nits).

Major issues:

-- None

Minor issues:

In 3.1:

Rules for Lexical Equivalence:
       Two GSMA IMEI URNs are equivalent if they have the same "imeival"
       value, and the same gsma-specifier-params values in the same
       sequential order, with the exception that the gsma-specifier-param
       "vers=0" is to be ignored for the purposes of comparison.  All of
       these comparisons are to be case-insensitive.

       Any identifier in GSMA namespaces can be compared using the normal
       mechanisms for percent-encoded UTF-8 strings.

UTF-8 reference (RFC 3629) is missing here.

[AA] Will add the RFC 3629 reference

A minor point:

10.2.  Informative references

    [8]   Crocker, D. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
          Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, January 2008.

This reference is Normative, because it is required to be understood in order to interpret ABNF syntax.

[AA] As indicated in an earlier response I will make this normative
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email