IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-05

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 29 November 2012 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE92021F89BA for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.143, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hvQlqfSFNSGF for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE8A21F88E8 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:24:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615869A400B; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:24:20 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2R6qyP2K6usQ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:24:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-96-255-37-162.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.255.37.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C3D9A4016; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:24:18 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWkKy9bTyXtwubsjM5cd97xeCtPWMVnADOFq6BzWN+R9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:24:12 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <41C6A3AE-A167-483A-8F84-E2A7D35F95AC@vigilsec.com>
References: <CABkgnnVo1LYt=LRbH8dPgaAaCY=GVNARC0y=E6E+bo5G=gNgag@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUgXGhEm6WeVzuYs7ADAQgifkApJe0_JimYde9mK1ARhQ@mail.gmail.com> <50A747F0.2090407@gmail.com> <CABkgnnWkKy9bTyXtwubsjM5cd97xeCtPWMVnADOFq6BzWN+R9A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid.all@tools.ietf.org, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-05
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:24:17 -0000

I do not see changes based on this discussion.  There should be some, right?

Russ


On Nov 18, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:

> On 17 November 2012 00:16, Brian E Carpenter
> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't quite understand that. RFC3986 section 2.1 says
>>  pct-encoded = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG
>> with no restrictions on HEXDIG, so why is %01 disallowed?
>> (I agree it would be meaningless, but that's another matter).
> 
> Meaningless is precisely my point.  It's unclear what is exactly the
> right behaviour in this situation, so hedging on the vague side,
> inadvisable as that normally is, might be safest.
> 
>>>> s/proxy/intermediary/
>> 
>> proxy or other intermediary?
> 
> Exactly.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email